@chesskid3 non-nutella scum in your game?
Town would rarely win if all of its members played the same way.
I donât love this vote unless you can tell me a reason why M2H deserves it based on something that M2H said.
No, but I donât especially need you to love the vote. Iâve already given my reasons for it. I would have preferred to vote Doggo, but Iâm yielding to my Neighborâs advice on Ellibereth.
So out of the remaining 5 players you could have chosen from, why did you choose M2H? What makes them a better vote than me, Doggo, Elli, UFO, and Fatmo?
You appear to be deliberately ignoring what Iâve already told you. Why are you still asking me why Iâm not voting Elli or Doggo when Iâve told you twice? Why are you assuming anything has changed since the reads I gave you last night?
Because I am starving for there to be any sort of discussion at all in this thread. And because thatâs not really what I am asking you. I will rephrase my question: Why have you singled out M2H as the recipient of your vote right now? What compels you to read him as scum, or all the rest as town? What has M2H done in this game specifically to warrant a vote?
Itâs not really about what M2H has done. Elli and Doggo are off the table because Iâm trusting Chess, which means trusting Elli. Chess and I actually also both agree Fatmo is town. I felt a townread on him to begin with, and Chess said post #19 in particular struck him as very townie.
So my pool is you, UFO, and M2H. UFO is playing in a way I see as very genuine for him, which for me merits him a townread. You at least are generating discussion and I have thought so far that it seemed town-positive. That leaves me with M2H, who hasnât done anything thatâs made me think âtownâ and therefore is at the bottom of my list.
Right now Iâm starting to wonder about you though, because this doesnât seem productive. I donât know what further information youâre expecting from me â I was very straightforward about why I was voting. Youâre looking for a deeper âWhy?â that doesnât exist. Youâre saying you want discussion, but I have nothing more to give you here thatâs going to be meaningful. So this could be a version of scum busywork â looking like youâre doing work when it isnât actually serving a purpose.
POE is good and I appreciate its application here. The next step should be finding a definitive reason to cal M2H scum. I say that for my own sake as much as yours: this thread is very stagnant right now. We have had almost zero genuine accusations being made in here. Itâs agonizing, Kimberly Possible. I propose we go and ISO M2H and see what we can find.
I would gladly let this thread stay idle if I was bad. And I think this paragraph is rendered moot by the above explication: you did provide information which satisfies me. Even if a lot of it is being restated, I like to have things fresh and immediately available. I do my best work in direct interactions like this one. I now know how you are feeling at this exact moment. Hooray.
M2H entered with posts 36-38, which are just an out-of-game refutation of Doggoâs entrance. There is an avenue for M2H to engage with the game here (they could provoke Doggo or produce a read on him here, for instance), but M2H does not take it and their focus is on things outside of this game. I donât know M2H so I do not know what standard to hold them to, but in a vacuum I donât love this entrance. I donât feel strongly about it one way or the other, though.
This is their self-analysis. I like to ask these sorts of questions to folks who are new to me because A) it opens the door for further conversation, and B) it allows us all to scan over their posts later on and see if theyâve lived up to their own billing. Iâll assess whether or not M2H has done that later on in this post.
For now Iâll note the same objection I noted earlier: this self-analysis excuses low-level activity from M2H in all respects. Theyâve downplayed their ability to produce accurate reads (always nonsense), thereby excusing themself from producing significant reads later on. I once again cannot say that I know what standard to hold M2H to, but this is twice that I have not loved their content.
I do not follow this logic. @M2H why would scum Doggo not advocate for your lynch? If you are town in a small game like this, it would be an easy approach for Mafia Doggo to take, would it not?
M2H would later add town reads on Elli and I.
Their reads have not progressed ~24 hours later.
This is progression. Iâll check the timing of this post after Iâm done with the ISO to see if it came before or after my vote for UFO.
This is their most recent post. It does not contain much.
I do not see many reads being thrown around, but M2H pledged to play conservatively (which is bogus anyway), and the reads that do exist all maintain the status quo. I do not see much direction or activity in these posts.
@M2H get in here and talk about the general direction of your thoughts with regards to this game when you can. Weâve got a small roster here, so everyoneâs voice is critical.
My UFO vote came in post #333. I stated my case in #347. M2H stated that âufoâs reads post seemed forcedâ in #357.
Is there a way to immediately jump to the top or bottom of a page without having to scroll? Particularly on mobil.
If you hit the blue bar with the post number on it, it turns into a scroll bar thatâll let you jump to posts faster, including the top or bottom. To jump to the top you can tap the header with the topic title in it and thatâll jump you up to the OP.
1 Like
Yup! 
Even more important here since things should be staggered.
@Mantis i know you pinged me but Iâm half asleep and will look later.
yo, just chiming in to say Iâm caught up with this thread, going to take a look at the other one now.
HMMMM