I also think you’re exaggerating my emotions. Histrionic? I’m trying to fight the back and forth happening between Urist and Nanook that might bleed into Town losing the game. Nobody else is doing it or even trying to get in between, or question the nonsense. But when I do it, it’s defeatist?
I would fight a bad argument regardless of how many Scum reads where on me.
like i guess i don’t get why you’re freaking out that he said he’s scumreading you
or turning this into a 1v1 between you and him when you’re never getting lynched today
I’m not “freaking out”. I’m challenging the view. How else am I supposed to get at what’s driving it? Or try and convince people sitting in the sidelines that the view is incorrect?
Listen if people want to Scum read me, that’s fine. It really doesn’t matter. But I’m playing to my win condition, and in my mind, that includes fighting wrong perceptions about my position in the game.
Kind of a pain to find on my phone, but it was a game here called flip flappers mafia, run by MS. I subbed into it as town, Andres was scum in it from the start. I’ll pull it up for you in a minute.
It’s subtle, but it’s the way he frames stuff basically. TownAndres is imminently reasonable and willing to listen, scumAndres twists and manipulates words to subtly change the meaning of what you were saying. It’s one of those things that if you aren’t aware of it can be hard to see but if you know it’s there you can see it sometimes, and I think it’s pretty evident in his recent exchange with me.
Okay so it looks like I’m not getting lynched today, mostly because of role reasons. If it isn’t Dan and I, who do you next think is most likely to be Scum? For a lot of people, it appears that the lynch is most likely to be between you and Urist. Does that make sense to you?
all of this feels overdramatic to me
like you aren’t getting lynched today
if an nk happens tomorrow you aren’t either so idk why you’re acting like you’re next on the lynch list tomorrow
I mean…I’m not compromising on a lynch with you, if that’s what you’re getting at. I’m pretty sure you’re scum, why would I compromise somewhere else for your sake?
Take a step back and think about what I’m doing. Most people agree that lynching between the Masons is bad play because we have you and your ability to JK us both tonight. Why would I be so insistent to change another player’s mind (and interrupt a conversation between Urist and Nanook) when I already know this is what’s most likely to happen?
i missed this sorry
this makes sense
Because it’s fucking scummy to panic as soon as someone considers the possibility you might be scum?
I dunno why I’m still bothering to interact with you, you’re so obviously scum here it literally pains me that nobody else is going to do what has to be done.
by freaking out i meant: you’re acting like you’re imminently getting lynched and that you must prevent that from happening and you’re getting very worked up about it
but like that’s not a thing that’s happening right now so i don’t know why you’re framing this as ‘people are trying to lynch me and i will fight it’
ok ill check it shortly
I don’t recall this level of histrionics, but the twisting words and meanings and continuous misrepresentation looks the same to me.
i think he was more careful about responding to pressure there than he is being here imo
whatever i don’t think it matters much today anyways, i’m not interested in lynching in them today
lynch nanook
mylo motivates me
i jk masons
screenplay does not make urist immune (and if he does i’d take it as a scumclaim)
cats cheks urist
tomorrow if there’s an nk masons are clear
there will be clear on cats
cats will allegedly have a clear or guilty
so assuming i’m dead: clear masons, possibly clear cats, possibly clear urist in six players, so tomorrow you just lynch screenplay since mylo is town
if i’m not dead we can revist all of this tomorrow