Signs Mafia

I don’t see any productive developments coming with the current focus, so Ima take a break for at least a few hours, maybe longer.

there is no hedging.

I don’t need to lynch screen today to prove he’s scum.

If you think he’s scum, why aren’t you voting him? Is there someone else that your vote would be better placed on, or what? Why don’t you have you vote on the presumably only scumread you have?

Hey look, I’m the only activity here.

I’m Null on them RN tbh.
Could go on them Day 2.

Popping in for a second to UNVOTE because it turns out that I have a lot of work to get done between today and tomorrow. Should be able to come back by EoD but worst case scenario, I don’t want my vote to be hanging around randomly.
See y’all later :slight_smile:

@sunbell its better to have your vote hanging around randomly ty.

Votecount as of post #191

Drifter (2): Prism, Seththeking
Dab (2): Ellibereth, UFOFever
Andresvmb (1): Srceenplay
DoggoPlays (1): JakeTheWolfie

Not Voting (7): Drifter, Key, DoggoPlays, Andresvmb, Dab, chesskid3, sunbell

I don’t think either Doggo or Screen look scum here. Screen’s overapplying the “busywork” scumtell, while Doggo is frustrated because they put a lot of work into their mechanics speculation. I’m impressed by the amount of work Doggo put into it, and it clearly took them time to think through. As mentioned, they also did it only when nobody else answered.

Simultaneously, it’s easy for me to see why Screen thinks it’s busywork. It’s not directly applicable to how to get reads, who to lynch, or really how to play the game out.

Doggo’s strength of reaction/defensiveness, and uh, not very veiled threat, leads me to think they’re town here.

The type of tells relied on thus far tell me that getting in between risks being scumread, but there are things I’m willing to change about my play to match the site meta/playerlist and things I’m not. In this case, I wanted to wait until the discussion between them had mostly wrapped up before I jumped in.

What do you think of Doggo’s refusal to vote anyone?

Of the active posters, there aren’t really any I want to lynch. Seth/Chess are maybes but that’s about it. I don’t like gut read hipfires, and that’s how I’d classify those.

Lurker lynch for me it is for now.

It didn’t really occur to me, and so far I’ve mostly found people I don’t want to vote. I was considering Jake, but I think a lurker lynch is better for now than trying to target one of the more active players. Not that I know where Elli’s getting his modkill threshold from.

VOTE: Dab

He’s saying that he doesn’t need a vote on Screen specifically. The threat is not veiled.

I see no problem here. I think he’s town.

?

Welcome back, what makes you think of Jake-and what do you think of Doggo/Screen?

This states that he sees no reason to vote Screen specifically. “him” is the keyword here.

So why wouldn’t he put his vote on his presumably only scumread?

No offense but I can only do so much for you here. You’ve got to read over things multiple times and think about what the person intends and means by it, rather than just skimming and accepting that your initial interpretation was exact.

Do you think there is any good reason for them to not have their vote on their top scumread instead of no one?

Nope, but my perspective is different from Doggo and his reaction is really obviously town so I don’t care about the lack of vote at all.