what
This is my 3rd game here (and that only because itās an extension of my 2nd game which was Mall Pirates). And the first one was me on the small boat of the crazy two-boats game. So my experience is limited.
So am I to understand that you also are of the āFuck you Iām not explaining my reads stop askingā persuasion?
This has proven to be a bad way of going about reading chess in non-ranked games.
Tell me what the good way is. Thatās what Iām asking lol
I meanā¦ I understand that the āfuck you Iām not explaining my reads stop askingā approach is annoying, but the truth is, if I do explain my reads, then you have the opportunity to disagree with my reasoning even if the result is correct. Whichā¦ Is bad, so going based on clout is usually the best optionā¦ AND, itās been going well for me recently.
As I see this game has a lot of newcomers, I may have less clout to flaunt around than usual, so I might need to pander a bitā¦
Let me adjust. I am diametrically opposed to explaining my reads before you give me your most accurate reads and explain why.
This also gives me an opportunity to see what youāre looking for, which will allow me to fabricate a read that makes you likely to sheep me.
I donāt have a fucking clue what my reads are. Nothing here is readable to me. The only way I got decent reads last game was Elli actually explained what he was thinking to me in our private chat because he knew I was town.
Iām not playing here again. This is fucking miserable.
I think itās really hard to adjust to a new meta, specifically this oneā¦ I ask ideally donāt give up on it so quicklyā¦ But what I said in my last post is true, like, if you donāt have reads (I have a few very high confidence town reads atm), then you probably are looking for the wrong things.
That gap canāt be bridged by me explaining my reads to you, because you arenāt thinking that way (based on the absent reads) and therefore me explaining my reads to you has a higher probability of resulting in you scum reading me than you sheeping meā¦ When I play off-site, I usually try to fabricate reasons that people can relate to because itās easier to justify.
Also, Iām confirmed town off of this post, among others.
Welcome to mafia 451
Okayā¦ look, what Elli explained were linguistic things. āFatmo wouldnāt phrase this statement this way if heās scum.ā Thatās stuff that makes sense to me.
I donāt have experience with most of the players here. The only read I have right now is UFO still seems towny to me. Thereās been very little content in this game so I donāt even know what you could be trying to read.
DKDK hasnāt even posted in the thread, how can you possibly justify voting there?
HOW?
Btw I actually think Iāve done a better job of explaining things to people this game (or last I suppose) I know theres culture shock but it does get better when you are used to it
Because unless Iām self aware AND on the ball, I donāt phrase things that way as scum. Honestly, Iām an easy read because I town tell very well.
Also, DKDKās choice of meme is scummy.
What meme? They havenāt posted here.
You were helpful in the last game.
I think 451 takes mafia games as less important dedicated things than other sites is a big difference
When Iām on other sites (Iāve played on some people in this games home site) I actually get more invested and usually even try harder, explaining and just I guess yeah tryharding in general
Here we donāt do readslist and big debates etc usually because I think games are less isolated important events, a lot of players here are more likely to multigame etc and if you lose one you lose one, we try win and thereās good standard but we (usually) wonāt cry if something goes bad cause thereās plenty more to come
Donāt know if that makes sense but itās how I look at it, it also allows a lot more experimental setups like this one or starvs last Harry potter game that can be fun but itās unclear balance wise to start
Every single one of my games are extremely well balanced.
The ISO button must be fuxxored, because when I try to ISO DKDK from the top post I get nothing.
Yeah but your last one was very experimental you have to agree
They only have 1 post check the op it shows posts per player in topic