Partition Mafia, OVER

Completed Games Completed Onsite
#83

I’m going to hold off and see what other people have to say before settling on a group to vote. It’s fine if people want to direct their votes to the group they think is most likely to contain Scum purely because of mechanics - I just think it might be best to, you know, try and figure out who is more likely to be Scum and go from there.

#84

Pls state at least one opinion for the record thanks

#85

One alignment related opinion

#86

I think you’re Town. I think Urist might be Town. And I think StarV’s vote completely against his own stated logic is Town derpness.

#87

I’m not sure about DS, but openly saying that they’re Town and know it for a fact in their group of 1 is not AI. I’ve seen that confidence from him as both alignments.

#88

Thanks

#89

Josh daring you to lynch him is funny. I don’t know what to make of it if I’m being honest. It’s bold if Scum, especially since Josh is in the group of 3 and may be in the group that is most likely to be lynched?

#90

Actually, I think this is better than my setup in 4-2-2. But yeah overall 4-3-1 I wouldn’t have done.

#91

Are you talking to me?

I dont do canned posts ever and that certainly wasnt one. I think its pretty obvious you can see my thought progression through those first few posts as I was figuring shit out

#92

I will cut u

#93

one day we will teach chesskid how to quote on his own site

one day…

#94

I think its mechanically better to go for the group of three in this instance because at the best you have a win, at the worst you have a 3v2 town to scum ratio going into day 2.

Obviously this is from my pov where i know my own alignment

#95

Because if we gamble and shoot at the 4, then if there isnt a single scum in the four we lose outright.

#96

I’m leaning against my own group, purely because I think most players would agree that mechanically the group of 3 should be lynched. It’s too easy of an argument if you ask me.

#97

True, it’s a gamble. But what is life if not a gamble?

#98

I disagree. Smells like someone who had 24 extra hours to plan an approach to being in a group of their own

#99

Leaning against as in you are thinking of voting C, bringing us up to 3 people voting their own groups?

#100

Yeah that’s what I mean.

#101

I’m concerned.

#102

Thank you all for entertaining me this afternoon, because I am seriously falling asleep at my desk, I wouldn’t be able to make it through today without this game. It’s quite funny.

Also, Andres I love how you discredited me about the 4 having the highest % of scum and then later post that you believe the 4 has the highest chance of landing scum.