I don’t. I despise memeing to the point where you stop being a functioning member of the town.
Ah yes, and no incitement or threats from you, I presume?
Except of course
If I did, I wouldn’t be interacting with you.
This is the fallacy of Tu quoque.
Town, Scum, Neutral, or even non-player, you’re going to hunt for my execution. Why?
And before you ask, no, I’m not going to answer this question if (when) you deflect it back onto me.
Sure fine, I’ll bite. Even tho I’ve been told on this meme site that casing is anti-town
I point out that Jake is lowkey scumreading me, but won’t actually commit to it by voting me. Scum do this all the time. Ride the fence, throw out a bait, see if someone else will bite and agree on banana being scum without actually commiting in case it doesn’t work out
Pointing out Jake’s bad logic that “banana can easily be faking their easy meta” - Jake as well can easily be faking their easy meta that I’ve observed of not trying and not solving
This further supports that. Jake literally said this earlier in the thread:
So I press Jake more to actually vote me if he scum reads me
He makes up an excuse about not voting me because he doesn’t want to cause a 3 way tie
I alleviate him of this excuse, by eliminating the possibility of a 3 way tie
It isn’t til this point that Jake finally provides any sort of reasoning for scum reading me. According to his own interactions with Andres, my posts/memeing are NAI - but now he says “and now you put me at Ex-1” as if that was scummy - yet when Gtacc put him at L-1 before, he doesn’t point that out as scummy
Why? FMPOV, it’s because Jake helped get me lunched last game for memeing, and thinks he can get away with it this game again. Even tho I was town flip, he sees me as an easier lunch than gtacc. That’s if he’s scum. If he’s town, he probably just genuinely doesn’t like me and is willing to cut me loose day 1 even though he is “against policy lunches”
I point out that he is scum reading me/voting me for something another player also did, and ask him for his read on that player, all I get is a snarky response in return
So tl;dr Jake, your excuse for scum reading me is shit, your vote is shit, and no, you have not done anything this game other than meme along with me and then push back against me. I don’t see you solving, I don’t see you scum hunting. You’re voting someone for policy even though you say you are against policy, and even though you admit that I am a “null” read
Jake Jake Jake Jake Jake. Why are you cutting the quote in half and ignoring the second half???
Sure, you’re interacting with me! You meme with me, you say that I’m not helpful, and you tell me that you are not at my beck and call to give a read on a player that put you at L-1. You threaten to ignore me. Yet you ignore what I’m pointing out as logical flaws.
No no, you don’t get to brush this off as “tu quoque”. If you are voting me for not being helpful, then you are policy voting me. Yet you’re not being helpful, so if that’s acceptable to you, I find my vote on you also acceptable because you’ve done 0 solving this game other than this attempt to OMGUS me.
You going to provide a read on GTacc now? Or even a thought about them putting you at L-1? Don’t you play on this site often? Do you have any sort of thoughts about them, any at all? Or are you just going to keep dodging everything I’m throwing at you except for a few choice things you can throw a witty response at?