Triple Tickle Game Thread (Day 4)

Sigh. Is that a commitment for forever? Did I say I would abandon all rational thought the rest of the game? No. That is simply a position I’m taking D1.

Ok, and I’m saying I have a problem with that position. I think it’s going to be anti-town when we ended up being happy about a VT tickle into lylo.

I’m also clearly not the only one that thinks that open discussion about strategy might not be the best idea. It’s clearly a divisive issue. But you just have to pick on me for some reason.

This isn’t about the open discussion on strategy anymore???

And furthermore, they aren’t even here???

Okay why don’t we just agree to disagree and not talk about the same thing over and over?

If you want a reason for why I’m picking on you for something that I’m not picking on you over, it would be because you’re here and they’re not.

Sure! I suggested an Erika tickle. Thoughts?

I don’t know Erika is actually very difficult to read.

I don’t have great history figuring out that slot.

You said you knew her correct? Does she have a specific meta?

It seemed like a natural defense with the accusation that you had already brought up (from my recollection of the read; feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, but I’m getting my ordering all jumbled from the whole reply system). I can see why Benedict is against the idea of this discussion; it lends itself to this kind of slot hunting.

With that said, I’m not completely blind to Sam’s actions. I think she’s given you way too much slack given the interaction; her vote and sudden back-off when she had your attention was really weird, and I don’t think that everything you did was NAI. Phone might have more info on if this is normal play for her (nobody knows anyone else’s alignment, so this is the one time I trust meta), but I think it’s kinda sketch tbh.

The only way that this is useful at EoD is trying to determine between two wagons. Then, using Spec likelihood would be viable (since one of them will always not be). The rest of the time we’d just be giving scum mounds of evidence for PoE to figure who not to target.

Also:
VOTE: Andresvmb

Nothing that Andres’ slot has done makes sense from a town perspective thus far. He’s been trying to hone in on who isn’t Specialist, which is fine in personal notes, but not theorizing out loud for the whole thread to hear. His thought process has been unintuitive at best and malicious at worst. I’m not able to see a skilled scum dig in that hard, but I’m also not able to see an experienced town with this line of thinking.

FoS at Sam; without more knowledge of how she uses votes, that vote/unvote’s still super sus imo.

Ah. I personally don’t see reason to townread her yet, and I’m against going for an afk right now as… it’s a shot in the dark. However I’ve found reasons to TR You/Phone/Spam/Luft

Also, my gosh messages pop up fast around here lol

Lol

Also to respond to your comment about my votes, it would require permission, but I could post a voting log from a prior game (i think prior games are allowed to be shown) where I voted and unvoted about 15 times in 5 minutes?

It’s not really alignment indicative for me, my vote is only going to be hard placed on someone I scumread decently or need attention from

The slot is mostly trollish from my experience. I’ve seen some good takes. I wouldn’t expect them to reveal all that much of their thinking, though they can be very stubborn.

Yikes

Not looking forwards to that.

I mean people surprise you. I don’t think Erika makes others not want to play or anything. Those were just my 2 cents.

If you’ve got a link and Seth’s go-ahead, I’d be glad to give it a look