i am aware i shold have worded it better but im glad he at least got what i was trying to say
Ya but theyâre gonna lynch and then ignore him
The mob has spoken
I like Joshâs idea even if it was a tad greedy, the execution was just off.
In particular saying âcop should only not be claiming if they only have one clearâ would have taken away a lot of the confusion since theyâd only have to look for the hardest soft.
He basically said that
No he didnât!
Yes, cop should claim as long as theyâre either or both of (a) one of {Urist, tn, DS, Dan}, or (b) have a result on one or two of {Urist, tn, DS, Dan}.
Ok well tn Dan are in there so
the âone or twoâ makes it pretty vague what was happening.
Yeah I guess 2 of maybe better
Look call me vain but I liked urists ATC
so when people play the setup in VM they have it so their are only alignment flips, which makes scum gambits potentially more interesting. might try next time.
Ugh then the temptation to lie as town goes to 11
I mean yeah, it basically gives room to a lot of interesting plays.
Lying as town usually leads to hurt feelings even if accurate play
1 Like
no argument from me i botched the execution.
Go back to appealing to chesskid urist
particularly, i should have had a post that says lynch dan if he is not the cop and i die tonight, or something along those lines
1 Like
Making those posts is hard tho
yup
urist playing video mafia with me has gotten a feel for how i play i think. heâs mvping right now, minus his awful andres tunnel he had before (lol).
really i should have just said nope i can read everybody in this game scum is dan or ds fuck the cop but i was trying to not play a selfish game around my reads, ah well. live and learn.
1 Like
Always be selfish
Always sheep chesskid
lol
see this is what happens when i give reads