Logically both Arete and I are practically confirmed. If you think scum would pull a stunt like that…idk what to tell ya. There’s no way they would leave one of their own out to dry just to save another.
Especially if it means putting both at risk.
I had a SLIGHT suspicion that Arete might have been lying and just gambling that I was either (so even if he did die, he could take down a town), but there’s not much reason for him to accuse bep like this if he is scum.
So
Arete and Eric lock town, a bep flip will further confirm that.
Squirrel seems like odv next kill, literally no matter what happens today. There was, logically, a scum among those final three with all the switching and squirrel is the only one left.
Orange would have been next for me, but scumteam saved us that one. I’m not sure of the logic here. I guess killing the top poster was a big deal to them? Otherwise I’m not sure why you’d park you kill on this slot.
I know that voting out bepwei doesn’t have a guarantee we know what Arete’s alignment is but I see no reason for the Mafia to accuse a fellow Mafia in this situation.
I do. Let’s say the mafia are Bepwei, Arete, and EK. By Arete ratting on Bepwei, that makes the two of them seem like townleans rather than as mafia. They would rather from a strategic standpoint have two mafias alive than one.
True, but assuming that all 3 are mafia wouldn’t it make sense for them to “investigate” someone who people are already suspicious of (like squirrel) and say that he is mafia rather than someone who is actually part of the mafia
There’s still another option. Let’s say Arete and EK are mafia, but Bepwei is town. By claiming Bepwei is a mafia even when he’s not a mafia, it means that it stalls on actually voting out the mafias for a vote.