Define what this means for you.
Because lynching people that havenât posted much at all when youâve done the work of clearing most people that are active is not a policy lynch.
And I donât see you offering any alternatives at all.
Like lynching lurkers and mostly null-reads over scum-reads, or am I misunderstanding what is happening here? Generally lynching people who do not really care or arenât playing much are what I would call policy lynches, though I may be wrong.
Is there a reason weâre lynching someone like that over someone scummy? Again I can only really skim the thread until now because I just got home so if I missed something I can read back.
The order of events was me reading your comment, interpreting it differently than what you meant but still in a completely logical and âcorrectâ interpretation based on your grammatical structure, you calling me dumb and telling me to reread, me saying I reread and restating my interpretation, you being unwilling to actually go back and realize that your sentences had problems that could possibly lead to multiple interpretations, and both of us calling each other dumb for 30 minutes. fun stuff.
itâs over now though⊠I hope at least.
Okay but, who in your opinion is Scummy?
I mean sure, this is exactly what happened.
I just find the expectation that people will try to speak clearly and if something seems off that theyâd go back and reread what they wrote or try to explain something instead of telling someone to reread the same poorly worded sentences 10 times and expect a different result.
over though.
To be honest chess/doggo seems somewhat scummy. Chess being worse than doggo mainly because of the âreactionâ to when whatâshisface.
These two posts in particular seem role-fishy (for the first one) and forced as hell for the second. Though interactions Iâve seen with them and doggo tell me itâs a forced SvS or a TvS at the very least.
Just seems eh to me
Asking for clarification before jumping on people when you arenât sure of what they meant would have avoided a lot of what just happened. Since, you know, it wasnât meant for you in the first place.
Guys, knock it off. Youâre not helping anything at this point.
Iâll get to Doggoâs side when I get comfortable after a shower and stuff since I stink from work, I is a smelly gal
Thoughts on those posts btw? Or are those generally NAI for chess, I canât see how they are
yeah no, you donât pal. For that youâd need to go into a thread, say your reads with zero justification and then never respond when someone tries to dig deeper or ask more questions. youâd have to feel so entitled that youâre allowed to sit in a thread, watch people do what they do, and make reads, but NEVER DARE to do anything that would let other player have any information to make reads back on you. youâd have to take everything in with never giving anything back. unless key is in the game and you then power synergize with her. but no key? fuck everyone else and donât do anything.
i am a pillar of salt.
Doggo is not Scum. I think I can say that pretty confidently. And Iâm not going back on that until Iâm either Lynched or NKâed.
Chess is, in my opinion, unlikely to be Scum. But, I could change my mind there if certain things happen.
Chess is 77.1% chance to be town.
(I made a math joke!)
I gotta say, this is pretty accurate hahaha
But does that post regarding the NK not seem forced as heck?
I mean tbf elli is usually fairly easy to catch as mafia and is pretty high accuracy as town, so
Whatever works
I mean it was a weird NK tho