@Nanook
Stop trying to argue against a lynch and try to argue for one.
I agree.
Nanook does seem to argue against players just for the sake of argument.
Is he doing it as scum to look busy?
Would he do it as scum to defend a scum mate?
Probably not.
So?
If he is agruing against lynching AD & Josh then they are probably not scum buddies with him.
Admittedly I think he does just like to be argumentitive.
I guess that is why I havenāt voted him (yet)
Been skimming.
I donāt see much point in lynching AD, other than advancing the game by one lynch of a player who isnāt contributing much for whatever personal reason. Lurking hasnāt, imo, been a viable scum tactic since about 2010. Scum are usually eager to be seen itt and influencing hearts and minds.
I feel catspurrās pain - I know most of you are used to these longass endless days, but a few of us are veterans of 24-12 games, and days this stretched out are like sitting in a dentistās office forever. I think if she were scum sheād be more entertained and less inclined to banging her head on the wall.
Someone point out screenplayās scumminess?
Urist seems to be trying to scum hunt. Muffins seems to be just rolling with the thread. (Urist, have I played on another board with you in the past?)
Mantis prob. town imo, which may be coloured by her being a familiar landmark.
More soon.
probably yes
Kind of what I was thinking.
possibly yes actually
Says the player who has posted 3 times in 72 hours (slight exaggeration)
feel like this sort of (probably faulty) empirical assertion is unsubstantiated
do you have scum reads?
Well, I am. As scum, I mean, eager to be visible and influencing people. And Iām quite used to seeing that tactic in many other players. Some just ride the thread being amiable, but they will be there and obvious.
I donāt! But if I havenāt specifically said someone looks at least a bit townish, I either havenāt looked at them or regard them with faint suspicion. It may be a long D1 but itās still a day one, and I suck at reads D1.
WRONG!
There are two words you have to post that absolve you of any responsibility for your vote.
Quote some townreadās post, with the words āSync Achievedā and you can vote for them.
I even have a reads list that is fairly convenient you can quote~
Maybe I should have specified that lurking is inherently scummy in long games where scum tends to run out of steam before the day is through.
I doubt weāve played together before, Iāve never been on MR.
Iām probably dimly recalling someone with a similar user name at ratskep.
Iām likely to run out of steam as any alignment in this long day games. 
So I donāt see lurking as inherently scummy unless itās a player who has a history of doing that as scum, in which case they are a terrible player if they canāt learn and their team should bus themā¦
Um, so vote AD
Thanks for reminding me.
UNVOTE: ActionDan since heās getting replaced.
catspurr? Already said above. I think town, trying to scum hunt, hates untimed as much as I do, would be less complaining if scum because she could hang out with her team and strategise.
I realise that isnāt very objective, but itās all I got until a few people have been kilt.
Orā¦ I love cats! Mine is 14 and a mighty hunter.
Have you not figured out who I am B?
Mantis and pyx figured it out day one wthout any prompting.
I agree and I disagree.
It drives me up the wall but seems fair enough as well.
UGG.
If ActionDans slot is scummy, why does changng the player change anything?
But it does.
I had Nannok as scum fro day one when he was the other player.
Everything he did confimed that slot was scum.
And then it turned out he was town and I was red of face and eating my words and all that.
Farrrkkkk Farrrrrkkā
Psycho Chicken Keska Say.
Better run run run away.
UNVOTE:ACTIONDAN