Well…yeah, I was undermining that point by pointing out the absurdity of it, lol. It’s ridiculous to say someone can’t think one thing is scummy while thinking another is even scummier. Like, can I only have one scumread at a time? That’s just…silly.
Lol.
But you ask for a cc.
Lol.
So you don’t trust claims but want someone else to claim.
On top of that you wanted everyone to claim to begin with.
Lol.
I see nanook as possible scum.
srceenplay asked me to vote nanook with me, so I did.
Why not?
I can move my vote around as much as I want.
Admittly using your vote means a lot more in plurality games than these abominations of majority lynch.
Nah, votes mean so much more in Majority. Every vote might be the one you’re stuck with, especially if it puts the person within a couple votes of being lynched. With plurality, you can just move your vote a minute before deadline.
There was no utility or purpose behind the fake claim in flipflap, the only info srceen took from it is that my reaction looked fake, but I was town so. The claim did end up being somewhat useful in the end, but it was in a way that srceen neither expected nor detected. I would go as far as to say that the claim here is at least as senseless as the one in flippers.
the nanook ‘lurker’ thing, the ‘i am very concerned there seems to be a wagon forming on urist oh no what if a scum voted on them (which is definitely not me btw)’ thing
I dunno, maybe it wasn’t helpful in the way he thought it would be…but I could, at the time, see how it could’ve been helpful. This is about what I thought of it, not what he did, isn’t it? In flip flappers, I saw how a fake claim could potentially have been helpful…here, I didn’t, not for town.