what I was pointing out was your emphasizing your honesty. That seems like it could be a nervous tic associated with you being mafia and thus trying to convince us that you are being honest.
Why would there be two scum in a pile of three if you are voting Chess rn? Wouldn’t there be theoretically 1 in three then since you are considering Chess scum? Either that or you’re currently voting someone you consider town?
The question I had asked you that you were responding to was: why does Andres alignment reflect on mine- to which you responded how you did saying two out of the three of us (me, Andres, jake -it is assumed) are scum. There was no mention of Chess in either my question or your answer so no that was not clearly indicated
thus andres’ alignment would be indicative of everybody’s alignment. Everybody’s odds of being scum is 40% at the start. Knowing my alignment means each person unidentified is 50% chance scum. Thus my chance of identifying somebody as scum correctly is 50%.
If Andres is town and I correctly identify him as such, the odds to correctly identify scum in the remaining three is 67%. That means you, chess, and jake could be above rand scum.