Triple Tickle Game Thread (Day 4)

Yep :blush:

VOTE: GoldenGirl

(jk lol UNVOTE )

That is an interesting thought process, tho. If we just let scum do their thing, they have an equal chance of killing each other as a randed shot.

So theoretically, if Spec gets lucky and makes it to lategame Town just wins lol

Actually, let’s try and tickle for Spec so they can’t stop killers from killing each other

Gigantic brain

They call me the Wildest Witch of the West

Now I’m imagining a Wizard of Oz/Mad Max crossover

With that said, I’m not sure if I like the idea of killing our best chance of winning, so I’ll just put the vote back here xD

VOTE: Andresvmb

This doesn’t work when nobody is in thread :<

Indian technique
This is more a mafia finding technique, than it is for 1ynching, but it always helps in 1ynching. In this you suggest something really stupid , like 1ynching the unccd cop or 1ynching the unccd sheriff. Sometimes even worse, I suggest something like nling on ml. When I do this, the mafia over reacts and that over reaction is seen by even the most stupid player on the table, and they 1ynch the mafia. Sometimes the unccd cop is mafia.

^from my friend :blush:

VOTE: Unvote

1 Like

Spak’s reaction was towny ngl

That’s a super fun strat, but it usually works better for scumhunting if you don’t prepend a ā€œhey do you wanna do a gambit with me?ā€ lol

I was actually hoping to see what Andres would do with it which is why I asked you but he went offline :pensive:

No I’m still here. I don’t have anything to say about it.

S…so… you just ignored it?

:<

I didn’t feel like being a part of an interaction with a player that called my thinking malicious no.

Isn’t that a bit unfair when he said it was only malicious if you were a killer?

And also… it was mostly with me?

No. He said it’s at best unintuitive, and at worst malicious. And since they’re voting me, Spak is clearly leaning on malicious.

Yeah, but it’s scum’s job to be malicious. That’s the nature of the game my dude lol.