Because if you are infact not lying, then they are severely “fucked” as you will either confirm a non-town or basically ensure a town-only chat in which all attacks are coordinated and all members ensure the safety of the conglomerate
I have no fucking idea what you’re trying to say
You do realize that if I die, and they figure out my partner (it’s already a narrow pool), the benefits become negative right?
And it’s only 1 shot so it’s literally a nerfed cop check. Oh and if it’s a guilty it results in death.
See
Now that are things that need to be said.
Really? Well I thought it was common sense. Sorry
No? In this scenario, the consequences are positive other than the death of two town. You confirm the statements of the other and they place their checks in logs or publicly, if logs arent available. Up to 3 town is a sacrifice if it outs a single mafia.
You’re going to have to explain it a little more simply, because I don’t follow you at all.
If I’m dead, there’s nobody to confirm anything. My partner will be voiceless in the night. They or the recruitee can only claim tomorrow. If the masonize fails or hits scum, they die. Nobody will know who the target is.
Unless I claim the target today. In which case it would be pretty dumb to lynch me today anyway because why not just wait till tomorrow for the target to confirm me as town anyway. JFC
And in no world is 3 for 1 a good deal. Like 3 for 1 is expressly terrible. Idk what is the culture on your site but in my world only 1:1 are value
Because, it expressively gets easier to find mafia as the game goes on that 3 for 1 is the optimal death count for the initial lynch forward. Progressively, you won’t require as many deaths as time goes on.
And 1:1 is a terrible value. It’s basically saying, “Oh! I want all mafia dead d2 so I dont have to play anymore”
I don’t agree but that is mafia theory. To me only 1:1 trade are fair, and even as scum sometimes it’s worth it to 1:1 in scum favor too
Huh??
1 town dying to catch 1 scum
Is worse than
3 town dying to catch 1 scum???
Are you okay
How many times does that ACTUALLY happen. It isnt realistically going to happen so it isn’t optimal.
I am trying my best but you completely lost me friend. Can you explain more clearly
Okay.
Let’s try to explain this in a different way…
1:1 only gives you output for likely one scum. You have to sacrifice more resources down the line to find more scum as tactics used to find the first won’t work anymore if the mafia is competent at all. Basing on consensus and a single mafia that could lead the town, this 1:1 ratio could become 5:1 next day.
3:1 provides room for easing of resources and often finds more than 1 mafia in the process of doing so. Because the tactics generally associated with this ratio are elaborate and long, they tend to massclaim and cause everyone to have a solified claim that could easily be disproven later. In the case of a non-mass claim, tactics used to catch the first will have a higher probability of catching the second. Hence why 3:1 is better in the long run.
Wait so why can’t we multiply that 1:1 to become 3:3?
for every 1 town that dies, 1 scum dies. Only 3 town die for catch 3 scum.
Instead of every 3 town that dies, 1 scum dies. To catch 3 scum this time 9 town dies.
I think???
I feel stupid now
Like if a cop claims to catch a scum, then the cop dies, then the scum dies, it’s 1:1
If the scum dies but the cop doesn’t die, it’s 0:1
If 3 towns die just to bag 1 scum… it’s called a massacre
I don’t get it