I didn’t realize that we were endorsing policy lynches on mafia 451 these days???
having a history of playing the game poorly isn’t an excuse for further bad play
why are you so confident on what’s good and bad play
also voting isn’t lynching lol.
Elli sheeping me demonstrates that I’ve made it to the next level.
Policy lynching somebody is by definition a rand chance of hitting mafia. If there is any way to get a better read on somebody than rand then policy lynching is ineffective, barring a scenario where one is so toxic that them being in the game is bad for town cohesion. I don’t think Seth is at that level.
noone was lynched
The question isn’t so much about whether policy lynching is good or bad, it’s about whether you would believe that I think policy lynching is good or bad. I think you have every reason to believe that I would think that policy lynching is bad. I really want you to be town because I think you would be very good to have on our team, but you being this bad is making me think that isn’t the case.
VOTE: Ellibereth
I feel like your comprehension is a bit lacking atm.
why are you even assuming I think you’re mafia lmao
I feel exactly the same way about you
you don’t exactly just throw your vote around
mixed strategy
Big brain
are you saying that you are just voting me because you think that I’m wrong about policy lynches and not based on my alignment?
I haven’t cared about anyone’s alignment yet
tbh at this point im voting you because of your bad theory argument and your reaction is funny
The hilarious thing here is that we’re voting with SethTheKing, which makes me think Seth is also mafia.
if this is your way of admitting that your read was wrong, then be my guest.
UNVOTE