Since you missed it, I gave the mafia reason behind my vote (Direct attention from me/potentially start wagon)
That’s half the story though. The town reason is to rope in other players and make them feel like they should be attentive or engaged when they come back in.
You do realize I said the exact opposite right?
There are 5 players with 1 post and you’ve picked one and are spinning it as a read do you see the problem
“Good votes” and “spinning it as a read” is a hell of a false equivalency, but even if it wasn’t…
No not really ayyyy lmao
Looking back I called them “not bad”, which definitely does not necessarily mean “good votes”, so perhaps it is I that falsely equalizes
Didn’t even take me a day to forget this was a thing lol. I think I’m fine with a massclaim, though tbh I haven’t thought about it for longer than 1 second and came into this expecting Elli to convince me which way I should feel about doing it. So Elli when you want me to claim tag me
We dont need to massclaim anymore 
I think Prism being super opinionated and voting early lurkers to engage them seems pretty normal, I’m more weirded out by Jake’s fixation there even before anyone posted and after what was basically just a misunderstanding over what “gaining a mislynch” meant.
@Prism if he’s town Elli tends to always pick roles that keep him from dying if he has the option, so him claiming ram isn’t too much of a reveal and claiming not ram would have probably raised some eyebrows (and pitchforks)
Also hi!
That they have you as their willing to vote Reads?
Me Too.
But Chesskid3 is on steroids currently.
VOTE: Drifter
I’ll go with Prisom here.
I’m sorta getting scummy vibes from Foxy but at the same time I’m not sure.
I call Jake Foxy.
Incorrect and I’d already posted the answer
me trudging through this thread trying to find reads
btw we should lynch the 2nd most likely scum today for (obvious?) reasons.
Or rather not the most obvious, fine with purging one of the three one-posters with slight preference to the ones most likely to continue doing so.
Who did you have in mind?
vagueness is also (perhaps less obviously) intentional.