Ranked 5v2

Completed Games Completed Onsite
,
#462

Should probably kill just one today to make chess endure another day lol

#463

:weary:

#464

Uhm, not exactly?

1 Like
#465

nanook def the best

#466

I agree with this only because it reduces the chances of you and chess scoring well.

#467

Actually, the Chesskid suffering is also a perk.

#468

Well, do you think M2H is a reasonable human being?

#469

Is this question intended as satire?

#470

VOTE: Andres
VOTE: Jake
VOTE: Gtacc

I would prefer if only one of these died tho

And tbh I kinda think Jake refusing to play is sorta kinda maybe a bit townie?

#471

idk, have you ever been on a mafia team with him? :skull_and_crossbones:

1 Like
#472

IIRC he flailed a bit that game, didn’t just shut down and not really play?

#473

I mean, that wasn’t my feeling at all, but I also didn’t really play that game LOL.

#474

It’s funny that Star, GTacc, and Andres are all voting eachother.

#475

You may want to put a vote down

#476

You realize that voting any less than 3 players is anti-wincon right?

#477

This is false but okay.

#478

If you want only one person to be TK’ed, then vote only one person. You can be the change you want to see in the world.

#479

WHAT ARE YOU SAYING? You have 2 confirmed town, 4 other players
 EVERYONE OF THE OTHER 4 HAS 3 VOTES
 You get the same benefit to voting mafia in a poe of 1 as a poe of 3.

I mean, this terrible logic by Andres just reinforces that he’s mafia. Yes, it can be OK for Nanook and chesskid to NOT vote 3 players, but they just risk losing MMR if they do so. That is their prerogative, but for winning, they should execute 1 by 1
 For scoring, guns a blaze.

1 Like
#480

Voting 3 players makes sense if you think the game will end today. If we tailor the TK to one person (anyone), then you don’t have to establish a POE you think urgently wins today, particularly with no NK yet in that scenario.

#481

It’s not terrible logic - you’re just really bad at figuring out how to maximize the outcome for Town.