Ranked 5v2

Completed Games Completed Onsite
,
#357

Or we could just kill you/GTacc and most likely win the game.

#358

But to be totally honest, I think it’s just GTacc.

#359

Jake is not likely to be Scum in my opinion, and I’m obviously not going to vote to TK Chess/Nanook today. Nanook is practically Confirmed Town, and Chess called out M2H first so that’s comforting.

#360

VOTE: Andresvmb
VOTE: JakeTheWolfie
VOTE: StarV

Sorry, exam in 1 week and hard af

#361

Didnt even get the chance to end my game

#362

VOTE: GTacc

#363

I’m fine being TK’ed if all of me, StarV, and GTacc are TK’ed at the same time. Any other outcome does not make sense to me.

#364

This solve is ridiculous and you’re probably just scum.

If I’m mafia, I just kill you on day 1 to guarantee points for living longer in an unwinnable set up. I could still try a push for GTacc today under the pretense that I didn’t really have time to check the thread because I’m renovating my apartment (Which is true).

#365

Why gtacc?

#366

@chesskid3 @Nanook Our vote today needs to include Andres

#367

I’m not probably anything. You’re just consistently wrong. You even voted with Scum M2H for 4 people at one point that would have lost the game.

#368

So M2H just copied his scum partner’s vote in the most hilariously bad way possible? I mean, why am I arguing with scum? :rofl:

#369

I’m not even arguing it makes you Scum. I’m arguing that your positions have been bad and you should re-evaluate.

#370

I think M2 probably includes his scum partner in the vote in order to “not be suspicious”.

#371

That’s 4 people. What’s your point?

#372

“Hey, let me directly sheep a town player who has recently been on the right side of a lot of tks.”

It’s reasonable to assume he thought I’d get more engaged.

#373

Uhm… My point is that I’m right. :stuck_out_tongue:

#374

You can go ahead and vote me, I don’t really care. My position will most likely not change, as stated in #363.

#375

And you’re just wrong btw. I’m hoping it’s just you being Scum, but I am more suspicious of GTacc right now.

#376

I have specific reasons to think it’s GTacc, in that they identified me specifically as not a TR but never defended that position when I asked. Now we’re getting a claim that they are just busy, which is fine, but I hard disagree with a Jake vote and they are voting there now.