Ranked 2v7

It’s rather counterintuitive that ranked mode would encourage play in such a manner.

It’s definitely a loophole that needs to be addressed.

The lack of subsequent posts are unacceptable. Sometimes, it is not the presence of something that keys you into a clue, but rather the lack of key elements.

Regarding what was acceptable about Gtacc’s early posts, let’s simply put it as them being of higher quantity and quality than half the other players at that early stage of the game.

Gtacc was outed by his third post lmao

what quality are you talking about man

here gimme a sec lemme post another wallpost

Quality that is superior to posts like these.

Please don’t. Nobody likes reading wall posts.

image

1 Like

sir can you show me where the quality is

Consider the fact that the number of posts made in this wall alone is greater than StarV’s posts over the course of the game.

so you are suggesting that you thought gtacc was town based on pure post quantity? because im not seeing any superior quality in gtacc’s posts and you can’t seem to verablize any.

Correct. That is why I only gave him a “light” town lean. Please don’t overstate the strength of my read on him.

ok, why did you vote starv over gtacc near eod yesterday before I pushed you onto gtacc

Because his post quality and quantity are comparably poor.

Additionally, he is the only player voting together with Gtacc. So, I have not written him off just yet.

From the POV of scum, do you think voting with a partner that is getting dogpiled on is a good move.

Irrelevant question. You could argue that “From the POV of scum, would posting like Gtacc did is a good move?”

To answer both questions, I think they are poor moves. But, they are both in the realm of possibility. Therefore, I cannot discount such a world.

it seems that scum!starv could have been trying to pocket me with the nanook push but then why keep pushing it rn when my stated opinion was to town nanook if gtacc flipped red.

Perhaps he intuited that your convictions are not as strong as you portrayed them to be.