It’s rather counterintuitive that ranked mode would encourage play in such a manner.
It’s definitely a loophole that needs to be addressed.
It’s rather counterintuitive that ranked mode would encourage play in such a manner.
It’s definitely a loophole that needs to be addressed.
The lack of subsequent posts are unacceptable. Sometimes, it is not the presence of something that keys you into a clue, but rather the lack of key elements.
Regarding what was acceptable about Gtacc’s early posts, let’s simply put it as them being of higher quantity and quality than half the other players at that early stage of the game.
Gtacc was outed by his third post lmao
what quality are you talking about man
here gimme a sec lemme post another wallpost
Quality that is superior to posts like these.
Please don’t. Nobody likes reading wall posts.
placeholder
Bet
Why the fuck the shit setup ive never played turned into this setup
Retarded cunt fuck I hope this game is not friendly
Sorry that was rude
Hmm very 451 regular playlist :idktbhprollyanod:
You are o.O what are you talking about
Chesskid found it before you
Bet your rank, if you are not accurate in this game you you lose rank and if you are you win rank
I want to eat sweet potato
Yes
I have never eaten kimchi I thought you were asking like in the PSY song
Yes
no there is only 1 I watch, welcome to waikiki
This game doesn’t have quicklynch rule, does it?
I mean quicklynch and no voters will be counted as voting town, to prevent this votes make nothing in first 48 hours. But votes counting 48h of this game?
VOTE: JakeTheWolfie
Pffttttttt
Guys in mafia451 we don’t value pushing lynches loudly the most what clem does makes sense imo
Were you mafia while doing it though
When you get home? Do you not work from home?
VOTE ME NOW EVERYONE
I’m wagon nuker what are you talking about
oh i forgot about that
I geniunely thought it was a good strat because forgot town votes make you lose points LOL
But if there is A LOT of town on you you lose more than they do probably
I remember you lose -1 for each town votes on you and -4 if you vote town?
Is this true
sir can you show me where the quality is
Consider the fact that the number of posts made in this wall alone is greater than StarV’s posts over the course of the game.
so you are suggesting that you thought gtacc was town based on pure post quantity? because im not seeing any superior quality in gtacc’s posts and you can’t seem to verablize any.
Correct. That is why I only gave him a “light” town lean. Please don’t overstate the strength of my read on him.
ok, why did you vote starv over gtacc near eod yesterday before I pushed you onto gtacc
Because his post quality and quantity are comparably poor.
Additionally, he is the only player voting together with Gtacc. So, I have not written him off just yet.
From the POV of scum, do you think voting with a partner that is getting dogpiled on is a good move.
Irrelevant question. You could argue that “From the POV of scum, would posting like Gtacc did is a good move?”
To answer both questions, I think they are poor moves. But, they are both in the realm of possibility. Therefore, I cannot discount such a world.
it seems that scum!starv could have been trying to pocket me with the nanook push but then why keep pushing it rn when my stated opinion was to town nanook if gtacc flipped red.
Perhaps he intuited that your convictions are not as strong as you portrayed them to be.