Well that was fun
Now, we get down to the core of rankedâsaying as little as possible while figuring out who to vote at EOD!
just bored
im also getting fatigued of you constantly suggesting that we should do towny behavior but then you donât do it so my suggestion that you do discuss is me literally saying that perhaps rather than suggest that the town discuss reads, perhaps you should take the initiative this time.
the above is all the substantive content I see from you while the remainder of your iso seems to be some combination of 1.) vague mechanical/general mafia philosophy 2.) suggestions to do legwork without follow through or 3.) filler content.
you initially had gtacc as a town lean which you then abandoned with basically zero documentation or elaboration as to why. âopening was fineâ doesnât seem to cut it in this instance.
I think you could start by giving detailed elaboration as to why you felt gtacc was towny at start of day and then switched on him, and adopted my exact POE, by midday.
I think we have a fairly set POE tbh just a question of what the best order is
you not seeing what im seeing with ms? might just be paranoia on my part tbh but the gtacc townlean into basically sheeping me with zero pushback along with fillery content is starting to get to me.
im gonna feel bad if heâs town, read me right, and then I just give the poor dude a heart attack pushing him like this
Why did you quote a gigantic wall of my posts?
I donât recall saying what the POE is/whether MS was in it
those are the posts of yours that I felt were substantive, it was mostly for my use but also to make a point that you havenât really given much in terms of reads
Would you like to compare the quantity of my substantiating content with the other players in the game?
Also,your statement appears to be a non-sequitur. Basically, what you are saying is that âYour posts are either substantiative content or non substantiative content. Also, let me categorize what kinds of non substantiative content you have been posting.â I donât believe this is a thoughtful accusation. Itâs equivalent to saying âYou are a male or you are not a male. If you are not a male, you can be trans or cis.â Therefore, I cannot see the point of your attack.
ZZzzz
you suggest doing busy work but donât actually do much. ie; asking for meta on me and saying nothing, suggesting to discuss without posting, suggesting that youâll âread intoâ people but post no insights
that seems to be compounded by the fact that you town read gtacc, and flipped on him by midday when pressure mounted against him. in addition, you adopted my exact poe which is fair in isolation but seems bad in a broader context. the vote on starv also seems odd as if it was an attempt at a counterwagon but then you just switch off starv based on my request with again zero pushback.
And, if your point was that I did not post enough substantive content, then the fact that you highlight a gigantic wall of my posts doesnât really help your case.
I didnât just post a wall of your posts. If you arenât going to explain your progression on gtacc then just say so.
I am of the opinion that you are not in the right headspace in the current moment, and therefore take it upon myself to disengage, in order to avoid an implosion. I inquire for you to revisit this thread when you have a clearer head, preferably after a good nights rest. Good night to you.
uh huh
Itâs simple.
Gtaccâs post quantity and quality was acceptable in the first 12 hours in the day. But, since he did not contribute further, the read staled after 72 hours. Itâs like inflation, or rotting meat. Hence, his contribution was deemed unacceptable at the standard of 48-72 hours and therefore I voted him.
what was acceptable about them and what post made you change your mind and think they were not acceptable
glad that yall are just as useful as you always are