Ranked 2v7

Well that was fun

Now, we get down to the core of ranked–saying as little as possible while figuring out who to vote at EOD!

1 Like

just bored

im also getting fatigued of you constantly suggesting that we should do towny behavior but then you don’t do it so my suggestion that you do discuss is me literally saying that perhaps rather than suggest that the town discuss reads, perhaps you should take the initiative this time.

the above is all the substantive content I see from you while the remainder of your iso seems to be some combination of 1.) vague mechanical/general mafia philosophy 2.) suggestions to do legwork without follow through or 3.) filler content.

you initially had gtacc as a town lean which you then abandoned with basically zero documentation or elaboration as to why. “opening was fine” doesn’t seem to cut it in this instance.

I think you could start by giving detailed elaboration as to why you felt gtacc was towny at start of day and then switched on him, and adopted my exact POE, by midday.

@Andresvmb you wanna talk this chat and a bit and we can smooth this solve out? lmk

I think we have a fairly set POE tbh just a question of what the best order is

you not seeing what im seeing with ms? might just be paranoia on my part tbh but the gtacc townlean into basically sheeping me with zero pushback along with fillery content is starting to get to me.

im gonna feel bad if he’s town, read me right, and then I just give the poor dude a heart attack pushing him like this

Why did you quote a gigantic wall of my posts?

I don’t recall saying what the POE is/whether MS was in it

those are the posts of yours that I felt were substantive, it was mostly for my use but also to make a point that you haven’t really given much in terms of reads

Would you like to compare the quantity of my substantiating content with the other players in the game?

Also,your statement appears to be a non-sequitur. Basically, what you are saying is that “Your posts are either substantiative content or non substantiative content. Also, let me categorize what kinds of non substantiative content you have been posting.” I don’t believe this is a thoughtful accusation. It’s equivalent to saying “You are a male or you are not a male. If you are not a male, you can be trans or cis.” Therefore, I cannot see the point of your attack.

ZZzzz

you suggest doing busy work but don’t actually do much. ie; asking for meta on me and saying nothing, suggesting to discuss without posting, suggesting that you’ll “read into” people but post no insights

that seems to be compounded by the fact that you town read gtacc, and flipped on him by midday when pressure mounted against him. in addition, you adopted my exact poe which is fair in isolation but seems bad in a broader context. the vote on starv also seems odd as if it was an attempt at a counterwagon but then you just switch off starv based on my request with again zero pushback.

And, if your point was that I did not post enough substantive content, then the fact that you highlight a gigantic wall of my posts doesn’t really help your case.

I didn’t just post a wall of your posts. If you aren’t going to explain your progression on gtacc then just say so.

I am of the opinion that you are not in the right headspace in the current moment, and therefore take it upon myself to disengage, in order to avoid an implosion. I inquire for you to revisit this thread when you have a clearer head, preferably after a good nights rest. Good night to you.

uh huh

It’s simple.

Gtacc’s post quantity and quality was acceptable in the first 12 hours in the day. But, since he did not contribute further, the read staled after 72 hours. It’s like inflation, or rotting meat. Hence, his contribution was deemed unacceptable at the standard of 48-72 hours and therefore I voted him.

what was acceptable about them and what post made you change your mind and think they were not acceptable

glad that yall are just as useful as you always are