I think claiming if a evolution stone is relevant or not to your pokemon is probably a good idea. Who gets the stone should be pre-agreed on and not lottery.
2 Likes
Votecount as of post #101
Andres (2): chesskid3, GTacc
The_Worst (1): ActionDan
StarV (1): Srceenplay
GTacc (1): the_worst
Not Voting (6): Tier, Josh, GIFbot, Andresvmb, StarV, Ellibereth
Uhmm, how do you ever see this as being a lottery?
I don’t think that’s fair because I don’t know if it’s needed or not.
So the things that makes most sense to me is to try and snipe it before scum get a chance to have something extra.
first come first serve is practically lottery.
Well, unless you apply some strategy and careful monitoring of sleep schedules 
1 Like
Anyone trying to take it over me is a scum claim
Google your pokemon
See if it’s effected by an evolution stone.
@GTacc you liked my post please claim if a stone potentially effects you tyty.
To reiterate:
I AM EEVEE
VOTE: Ellibereth
I’m all for solving the problem with the stones now.
I don’t need any stones if stones are only relevant with evolutions
It’s true, you’re most likely town here.
That was fast
I’m assuming there are 3 since said when there were 12 people, DS told us it was scumsided. I don’t really know the balance thing though, but since if there was 3 scum when there were 12 players, that would make 8 towns assuming Josh is telling the truth. 2 scum 1 survivor 9 town does not seem scumsided to me, thats why I think there are 3 scum. But again, I’m not the balance guy, maybe another person should talk about this
Random but game is 1st gen based
1 Like
I can’t find anything about stones.
I’m still taking it.
I dont speak nerd what are the options
*but