Parity Cop 9'er (3, 4)

VOTE: Duskfall

Don’t you usually start with a scumread on me

why bother when the end result is the same

I don’t really TR him yet tbh, so far he’s not really anything except…star.

Reasonable

I think dusk is pretty similar in tone to last time I played with him, when he was town. Tiny sample size yada yada but preachy and pushing for townreads is exactly why I misread him last game

I dont have a read on star tbh

Nanook prob town

Dusk, is there something besides the snap read that you’re scum reading Dan for, or is it just that?

I think town bloc of Dusk/Nanook/M2H is a good start (M2 get over it, Dusk is very likely town). Kinda want to TR TN on tone but not committed to that yet. Same with DS. Dan I like the sass. That leaves me wanting to TK in Tommy/Star/Andres. Tommy is a headache to read so don’t really want to right now, begrudgingly will later but not right now. Star is just sort of under the radar for me, so I’d probably be OK killing there. I guess Andres is playing but I literally can’t remember anything he’s done off the top of my head :woman_shrugging:

VOTE: Star

This is a good place to start I think.

@DS @M2H why the TN votes? Is it just for his prior absence or…?

His vote on me was awful

I don’t think town Dan has ever actually been sassy in the past so I don’t get how it correlates with him being town, I get it for some players but idt it makes sense with dana meta

Andres hasn’t actually done anything yet so he’s a hard null

It’s awkward af, but I dunno that it’s scummy? Gonna need more to sell me on it at least.

He asks me a question but clearly doesn’t care about my answer, from my perspective at least

Feels like he’s attempting to look like he’s solving my slot but just faking it to get a vote down on me

Eh, probably falls under the “this is a stupid reason to TR someone” umbrella, but I still kinda want to tbh.

Tbh I hate both players in my wagon rn but idt they are both scum, exactly one scum on my wagon rn I think?

Sure, but I can see how he might interpret your answer as adding thoughts after the fact as opposed to representing your thoughts at the time, which I think is what he’s saying. Like, I disagree with his conclusion, but I can sorta see how he got there, if that makes sense

I disagree with you but I understand where you are coming from, idt you need to make a big case every time you vote