The first 5 posts happened early in the game. The last 5 post happened near MYLO/LYLO. What do you think the alignment of these people are, and why do you think they are that alignment?
Quote 1 said:
What I can see here is a lot of abilities being used during Night 0.
- Twelve votes to lynch. That’s not the majority… Someone’s gone and decreased the vote weight.
- Two players to lynch. Probably another ability, but it seems powerful; might be a one-off.
- “Someone’s dreams have become a reality!” could also be in the update via use of an ability.
We should figure out the roles that each of these suspected abilities might respond to. There could be scum behind any of them.
Click to expand…
Quote 2 said:
Well, there is an echo and there is a scummy echo. If you refer to the former, meaning the sheer fact she repeated what you said, yes it can be called an echo. I am just saying that it is not uncommon that during RVS someone makes a questionable post, and get a couple of responses (by 2 responses I meant yours and [Player 1]'s) instead of one. If the case were that you voted someone, and [Player 1] voted the same person, you would not call it echo, you would call it a pressure.
Quote 3 said:
@[Player 1] I think that the OMGUS conflict between [Player 2] and [Player 3] is important, but I think both (for now) are townie.
So for in day one I say either Nolynch, ##VOTE: [Player 4], or [Player 5].
Quote 4 said:
@[Player 1] vote [Player 2]
It’s not unrealistic at all. If you don’t participate you are scum. They can’t find the seer if people participate correctly. Those without information roles would need to guess more town than scum. If scum could determine who seer was enough information would be posted where we win.
Quote 5 said:
We need to be careful with how we handle new players. They’re in a Catch-22 on this site. They can either:
- Panic – Scumtell
- Be Calm – Being coached – Scumtell
- Lurk – Scumtell
- Post fluffy posts – Scumtell
New players to werewolf aren’t going to contribute mountains. They’re already at a disadvantage because we can’t metaread them (imagine if a new player played like me or [Player 1]; we’d lynch them right away) and so we can’t get caught up on what are alleged scumtells and we need to focus on the bigger picture. Also my personal philosophy of “bettering the community is more important than winning the game” means that I don’t think we should lynch [Player 2] today in any case.
##UNVOTE VOTE: [Player 3] because you’ve been around long enough. I don’t find it scummy that you used RNG. I find it scummy that you backpedaled and denied doing so. If you’d have ridden out the storm instead of fighting it, you would have less votes on you. As it stands now, you panicked hardcore and admitted to lying (which we should technically LaL you for anyway). It shows an unnatural need to not have any suspicion on you, which is something you usually have when you’re scum (and most players do). That’s why I want to lynch you today – not a random D&D joke @[Player 4].
Click to expand…
Quote 6 said:
I silenced him because I had to pick someone. I think he’s scum, so it’s natural that I pick him.
@[Player 1] I’d rather not run out the clock on this. How can I convince you to change your vote?
Quote 7 said:
I don’t think [Player 1] and [Player 2] would bus eachother so much as scum. I’m a townie, so there’s either 1 QT member that’s scum, or the unlikely bus. Personally, the unlikely bus, combined with the ulikely setup, makes 1 QT member is scum seem much more likely.
[Player 3] is not suspicious for this at all. From his POV (assuming he is a townie), the person who survived two nightkills isn’t scum. Either [Player 4] and 2 QT members are scum or [Player 4], 1 QT member, and someone who is almost confirmed indie is scum. Of course, its only natural to assume the two QT members are scum. Then, who seems to be working together in the QT? Me and [Player 2].
I’m pretty sure he is a scum, since those possibilities both seem unlikely. But the reasoning he’s using is not flawed.Click to expand…
Quote 8 said:
Yes, we can lose…
The wolf is confirmed to be be one of THREE people (me, [Player 1], [Player 2]).
We get TWO lynches before the wolf wins.
Quote 9 said:
Give me one reason why you guys suspect me.
Quote 10 said:
But then again if we really want to do it… You need to use your vote [Player 1]
Since me N [Player 2] have 1 vote weight
[Player 3] have 2We need your vote of at least 1 and have me n [Player 2] vote for [Player 3] to prevent getting a tie
Click to expand…
