M17 Dead Chat

[orangeandblack5]

still at least he’ll figure it out because he literally has to

it’s just a matter of convincing ejji

which, honestly, I think if anyone in this game would be convince-able it’s ejji

we’ll hope I guess

[Nanook (Clem)]

I mean he has the right vote and is on the right mechanical error path

Idk how you’re supposed play out of this really, huge hole to dig out of thats totally dependent on getting people to believe that mandatory doesn’t actually mean mandatory lol

[orangeandblack5]

yep

fun

[orangeandblack5]

@Andresvmb

Are the Scum NKs actually mandatory as per the rules?

lol

[orangeandblack5]

votes are locked, he can’t change

[orangeandblack5]

or that

[orangeandblack5]

see friends

this is the gameplay we want

[Nanook (Clem)]

I don’t blame him at all tbh

[orangeandblack5]

I think it was the wrong move

Although presumably that means Quin answered his “is the kill actually mandatory” question with a “yes” which at this point does move into malicious intent territory imo

[Squirrel2412 (David E)]

@Quin

Giving me an angry squirrel for exposing game state and probably also resulting is a disputed result.

I actually wouldn’t be mad lol

I didnt know whether no kill was an option or not when I submitted, seems fair to let town know as well

[Andresvmb (Andrés)]

I KNEW IT.

[StarV (NotanAxehole)]

@JKBear331

also now wondering a bit if StarV actually read the CD rules that were part of this game

If there is text to read, you can assume I did not read it.

[orangeandblack5]

don’t worry I changed the rule from “follow the Chief Delphi forum rules” to “fuck the Chief Delphi forum rules” so you good

[StarV (NotanAxehole)]

@EricH

Correct.

But what he is doing is saying “this is the facts, no I’m not going to explain Jack shit, do what I say.” I know that I don’t operate like that. Give me SOMETHING that I can relate to, or go punch yourself in the face.

Even a “his posts are telling me that he’s X and here’s a sample for you to figure out why” is better than “because I say so”.

Ask Orange after game end. In a shooting game where we were both Town I shot him because he was pushing too hard, and to me a bit too personal.

There are ways to convince me; lack of evidence is one of the worst, second only to talking down to me.

I understand this perspective, I try my best to keep it clean despite being aggressive… But I do see how that alone puts people off. I get what you’re saying, but like for me, I just don’t see the point in playing if I’m willing to just compromise on my reads and deliberately kill players who are nearly confirmed town from my PoV.

If you look at the times I compromised this game →

Off of mafia JKBear onto town vig GKB
Off of Squirrel onto other I forget who even died that day, but they were town.

I’ve found that if I give the actual reasons for scum-reading people, they either get upset at the B.S. or they completely ignore what I consider to be real tells.

It also feels cheap if I make up a bunch of reads that support my “case”, so I deliberately tell people the reads I’m giving them are made up in hopes that they find something in there that they actually believe in (despite the fact that I don’t actually view it as a valid read). —> By doing it this way I feel I have a shot at convincing people who agree with those reasons while not pushing away people who disagree, because they can’t argue what I don’t think is true.

[laserlab (William)]

I just realized that I broke CD forum posts by editing my posts

[laserlab (William)]

Oops

[orangeandblack5]

Banned