Off the top of my head, I think the only thing that stood out to me what him pushing for people to reveal their PR/draft numbers (I don’t actually remember which one or if it was both, once again I can take a closer look at things in the morning) which I think is a bit pushy and not entirely beneficial to town. Since it is essentially just bringing conversation that could wrongfully condemn people quite easily.
So I guess I think he’s being a bit sus with his choice of actions.
Also I have the memory of a goldfish and don’t really remember anyone’s game-styles so this is gonna be a rough game for me and my untrustworthy gut feelings
Oh yeah that’s a section that really stood out to me too
This whole interaction set off some flags in my head, I just don’t know what to make of them
It’s very possible that their short respondes were just in response to the short start to the conversation, but the whole thing kinda gives me the vibe of two kids trying to bring something up at the lunch table to get others to talk about it and doing it real awkwardly
Not to be an ass or discourage activity like this, but why cattypaws? Like why even bother with an iso of two posts?
Also I doubt that opener is townie, and you’re drawing WAYY more out of it than there is. Sus.
It’s making me mad sus that I brought this up and everyone is, god forbid, agreeing with me. Smells like . I will probably re evaluate this in a few days.
You got something you wanna say
Never did that. I asked people to tell me what they thought was the most powerful, and asked orange what he would have picked (I very specifically only asked orange).
Agreed, if I had done that, that would have been v stupid.
The first half of your statement is facts, conversation=good
Where you don’t check in on a game for a whole day
Then you do get a chance to hop on and you find yourself reading 500 posts
Lemmie tell you, and tell me if I’m wrong, but retention rate is VERY low.
There is no way she remembers that much about my specific actions but doesn’t bring it up on her own. The conversation between her and squirrel hundo P something that squirrel would wright to pin it on two of the most seasoned players here.
I’ve played with both, and everything Kaylee says just sounds like it’s right out of the keyboard of a squirrel coach.
VOTE: Squirrel2412
I would vote kaylee but I’mma give her the benefit of the doubt, plus squirrel more likely to be here sooner and defend himself with fire.
not really a fan of this opener, it feels kind of defensive despite them not really being under much pressure
same with this
they seem really bothered by early votes, in particular their point 2 is shade without actually voicing a scumread, which is kind of wolfy
this is a reasonable thought but I don’t like how they don’t … do anything with it
like they don’t try to use this to solve, or actually come to any conclusions
quoting these together even though they didn’t actually happen together because they’re just about the best posts in the entire Iso
which is not to say that they’re particularly good posts but they at least have … some semblance of solving?
other than that there’s not really anything resembling a read or an attempt to solve
Overall conclusions
Overall, I have this as a scumlean, they haven’t really made much of any attempt to solve the game, or any reads, and their early posts are weirdly defensive
I’m trying to cut them some slack since IIRC they’re new but even taking that into account I still think they’re wolfy
If I wanted to falsely accuse either of you, I would have done it much, much earlier in the thread.
The reason I asked Kaylee specifically about this interaction was because I was in the process of iso’ing you, noticed it, and wanted to see if someone else shared the same thoughts.
. I will probably re evaluate this in a few days.
