I agree that it is not necessary. But I love big brain plays like this.
DO IT!
I agree that it is not necessary. But I love big brain plays like this.
DO IT!
Who are you going to vote when you post your gambit?
Whoever town agrees on
If town is still as split as they are rn Iād probably vote cat or GKB
Ok. I wasnt sure if you planned to vote before your flight or if you would have a chance after.
Its a 5 hr flight so Iād almost certainly vote before
I guess we should just go ahead with the bus on catty. The EK plan is probably too risky, me thinks. Plus with your gambit, I doubt we have to worry too much about being voted tomorrow.
You may want to include EK into your gambit, since he wasnt on either side of it. Or was that intentional?
Uh yes
So the doc would show as visiting themself?
Yes
Hmm well heck
Then it technically doesnt work
Did catty track you?
N1 yeah (no visits)
The issue is that the apparent gambit is now sunk by the fact that thereās tracker results on me, which means I canāt really execute the fake gambit as town
Hmm
And claiming to forget to submit a night action is probably really sketchy
Hmmmā¦i really doubt anyone will actually look back at cattys tracking. And if they do, could you just say you assumed they got that result because you protected yourself.
If anyone asks gellnick for clarification and they find out she should have gotten the result of you visiting yourself then we can bus her even harder for lying about her claim. Because onviously she tracked a scum that night and saw something she didnt want to reveal.
Hmm thatās true
Though Iām not āactually doctorā (the point Iād that town me fake claims doc to influence scum into making s suboptimal nightkill)
So itās really the question of ādoes town me think scum will look back at catās tracking,ā which, given I think cat is scum, would be a yes, so town!me wouldnāt make the play
Then again, town!me might have forgotten cat claimed to track me, so thereās that way out ig
Uh yes
will do, just got home from church