I disagree with your assessment
VOTE: Starv
Ah man, the last member of the Chesskid3 wagon, welcome aboard.
1 Like
The last member was actually Chess
3 Likes
No, but I think heās been kinda busy.
In any case I think that Jakeās fakeclaim had more scum motivation than town motivation. I believe he thought he was going to get lynched regardless, and decided to fake something that would out the vig, so that his team could shoot that person after his lynch.
I really donāt see the downside to lynching Jake today, and Iām relatively certain it hits scum.
And if Jake flips town then we can lynch Elli or StarV tomorrow, whichever.
So you donāt think this is Ellis town game but you are willing to follow Ellis read because Jake has been scummy
My concern is that a scum starV will dominate conversation with the masons dead
If I think Jake is scummy, am I really following Elliās read?
And I really donāt think that Star makes it through this game without being lynched.
1 Like
Sorry man, scum!starV doesnāt kill these masons 
How does he out the vig?
The vig could claim to prove Jake is fake
I guess Iām missing the whole picture
Basically Jake claimed responsibility for scum dying in the night, if heās scum itās because heās trying to draw out who actually caused scum to die in the night.
1 Like
If heās town, then itās just a massive blunder because scum know heās fake claiming.
If there is a vig I say let them shoot Jake. Thatās kind of their job. Right?
The thing is that it might not have been a fake claim; that might be Jakeās actual role LOL
Well, no because we have a difference between Jake and Elli, so itās better to lynch one, if town, shoot the other. (assuming unlimited vig)
? How so?
Scum know who killed scum?