No one visited Erika?
And yet she was killed?
Seems strange.
But also seems a strange claim for scum to make.
No one visited Erika?
And yet she was killed?
Seems strange.
But also seems a strange claim for scum to make.
Iām not sure about this.
The most they would be able to kill would be two.
Masons seem to be a pair.
Srceen claims his neighbourising ability was cut down to one shot.
Town have a lot of scatter shot roles like Neymar/Cheekies.
^cheekies multikill power was One Shot Limited.
I had a role which failed last night.
The GM reported to me that it Failed.
Skitter and RedFlavour.
What was your reports from the GM like?
Dd they say no action seen or no results or what?
The reason I ask is because it 'Failed" and my target has not been claimed as a target of any other town special.
So why did my power fail?
Was my target protected in whihc case it could be a scummy protection from just that target?
Or was I caught up in a scum power like what stoped Redflavour from seeing Erika killed?
i didnāt get a response from the mod
Thanks Skitter.
RedFlavour, where you told you saw nothing?
I have a feeling that the one scum might be right and that they have something like what Nanook claims. A power to blanket block all powers.
But it is only one idea.
I will tell you what my one shot power was.
I could target any player and the next Day there alignment would be announced.
As I say, I got a report from MS, Failed.
Why?
We know we have roleblockers jkās in this game.
Skitter just being a straight up JK doesnāt quite vibe with what weāve seen so far from the role flips (with knowledge of my own role also) though Iām hard pressed to believe a scum partner claimed their scum partners claim lol
Ok, here and catching up. Probably wonāt get caught all the way up, but I also stay up much too late on halloween so Iām sure Iāll probably find the time to finish whatever I donāt get to tomorrow.
Correct outcome, horrible logic. Screenplay couldnāt have killed anyone N1 due to my role, so his taking an action without anyone dying is in no way actually AI.
It seems to me that thereās a world here where DS is scum trying to guide the lynch onto the players whose roles he knows less about. His posts in the 1630s and 40s kinda strike me as weird from that POV. Not sure if thatās a world I buy into, but itās worth considering.
I also forget where his vote ended at EOD, and if he jumped onto Cheeky, when he did so. So take that with a grain of salt.
Uhā¦I seem to recall you vastly preferring Plurality lynch and bitching about the transition from plurality to majority in the past? Am I hallucinating?
Nevermind.
ā¦how does this make sense? Are scum normally informed what roles are in a game while town arenāt? I donāt get it, is this a thing that happens?
I know for a fact you donāt always use the scumboard, or use it sparsely, not sure why you expect differently from others
This seems like a convenient way to avoid making reads, by saying āitās probably just the lurkers.ā
Itās just a lot to read in. Like, some scum teams play as a team and help each other out like that, and some play as individuals. Iām not real comfortable assuming one or the other (and it seems especially silly to do so before you have a flip, as you were doing here), it just seems like the kind of assumption thatās super easy to get off the rails with.
1740s and 50s, donāt love Uristās defending of Cheeky. Feelsā¦reachy. Hard to say how much 20/20 hindsight is involved in that, though.
2/3 aināt bad
This is demonstrably silly, since scumNanook couldāve done that in a much better and more efficient way that didnāt use up his role. Likeā¦do we really have to cover this same ground again?
Ok, that brings me up to 1792. Was hoping to finish catching up on D2 this morning, but thatās not happening at this point. Will try to finish catching up tonight.