They always scum read me and want me lynched but seem to have just given me a town pass this game
I would say 2-3
Thatâs to pool to look in
your play hasnât been stunning but the role you claimed makes me very strongly suspect that youâre town. at least enough to give you a pass til lylo.
cheeky not being here doesnât look great tbh
Not really here but sorta here. Iâm skimmed. I think between skitters and cheeky Iâd probably rather kill cheeky. Given my prior townread on her, and the fact she claims to have holstered it for a reason that makes senseâŠseems more likely to be cheeky as scum than skitters. Possible that theyâre both town with similar roles with different limitations? But yeah, kinda seems unlikely, since cheeky presumably wouldâve put those out there sooner if they existed.
VOTE: Cheeky
^L-1^
@Cheeky should really fullclaim before someone hammers.
and VOTE: skitter30 so that i can be on what is probably the correct side of this lynch.
iâm really interested in why you believe cheeky over me
(or, more precisely, iâm interested in your progression of believing the person you were voting when they made the claim)
i believe that youâre both jailkeepers.
i donât believe that youâre town.
I probably donât have time to fully catch up and comment today, but Iâll catch up on stuff at the start of D2. Assuming thereâs a vig, Iâd say shoot skitters if cheeky flips town, if they flip scumâŠdunno, Iâd usually say holster, but if youâve got a good scumread, a shot to give us another flip is probably not a bad thing after a stalled D1.
also i donât have limitations beyond counting as a protective wrt dsâs claim
a couple of things:
- your role has no limitations, which is more what iâd expect of a scum role (you might also just be lying about not having limits). you said youâd be able to concoct something as scum, but Iâd be interested in hearing what kind of limitations you could dream up that wouldnât open you up to either being caught in a lie or having to skip out on roleblocking people.
- you didnât ask cheeky to clarify her role / cheeky generally seems more open to the idea that you both could be town. because as we all know, only a
Sithscum deals in absolutes. immediately seeing the situation as a 1v1 is a scummy behaviour. - cheeky probably would have not dropped a jk claim on the thread if she were scum, i imagine sheâd embellish a bit to make her role seem more town.
Skitter did claim first, so the logic of âwhy would scum skitter 1 v 1 hereâ doesnât hold up I gesso.
- prob something along the lines of loyal even-night jk; maybe non-consecutive night instead of even-night
- cuz having two jks in a 12p is bizarre. i know that iâm a jk and since i doubt that there are two that would imply that sheâs lying
- honestly i donât think that she knows enough about the game to come up with a claim that seemed townie. i kinda think she just yoloâd it
(also youâre saying iâm scummy for not having modifiers that iâd have to make up, but itâs townie of her not to embellish her role? thatâs a bit of a double-standard)
Distracted? Are you Scum here?
VOTE: Cheeky
Thatâs a slip, and we need to punish it. If this flips Town, then something is wrong.
Funny, it didnât register with me either. I had to go back.
- yeah thatâs what iâm saying, you could make up mods for your role, but itâd prevent you from blocking people on half the nights in the game (unless you wanted to risk getting caught in a lie).
- having two announcers in a game is bizarre but here we are.
- she would have buddies as scum to make stuff up for her, unless theyâre afk i guess.
- she is saying she has mods to her role, but hasnât claimed them.
also andres just hammered not surprising but zzz
this is why we canât have nice things, people shouldnât vote on catchup posts with 2.5h left to deadline
VOTE: Skitter30
I doubt it. Ugh one of you is probably Scum.
1 Like