Im not worried about being lynched today, I dont think town is stupid enough to actually go down that rabbit hole on what is essentially a day one.
AD believes Iâm town. Cats did. But yes is an outlier.
Sorry I still need to fully type my thoughts on PC.
From your town group⌠I have Andreâs as town. Ad as well. Nanook am wary. Skitter am wary⌠but am less wary of skitter than nanook
And I sort of hope the same for myself. As said I dont want to be mislynched.
Maybe looking at outliers would be the better idea here.
You were in Shakespeare right? He lurked as scum
I really want to figure this out. I even at one point had thoughts on urist/cats.
The only ppl I really have as town are AD and Andreâs. And thatâs not so great
I am a little wary of skitter because she may be pocketing me, but i wouldnt vote there today at all.
so i decided to reread skitter with the assumption that she normally plays cautiously as town and VERY cautiously as scum. so on my reread iâm gonna ignore stuff surrounding caution, opportunism, etc. to make the world a happier place.
i have a couple of comments (big surprise right?):
- In #526 you attack cats for proposing to lynch both dan and his buddy, if theyâre neighbors. I know youâve already answered Nanook on this - you said that cats looked like he was searching for mislynches - but do you really think that scum would suggest such a thing? What do you think about the fact that cats never pursued the issue further?
- I see that youâre regularly questioning erika, nanook and andres as well. maybe i was wrong to say that you were tunneling on mantisâŚ
- In #749 you say that Nanookâs role looks like a scum role but that you donât want to test it. This doesnât add up to me. Wouldnât you want to force him to use it as early as possible if you think itâs a scum role? I noticed that you flipped over to reading Nanookâs role as town on d2, what changed?
- I actually like #947 even though i know itâs entirely mafia discussion and nai. i guess itâs that your tone is unaccusing that i like.
- #1068 I donât really like though. I feel like itâs fair to say that someone is weaselly as scum. And the point of calling someone weaselly is that you wouldnât be able to tell that they are being a weasel in a given game until itâs too late. And I donât think itâs fair that you single Mantis out for saying thereâs scum in a group of 3 when countless (at least 3, iâm incapable of counting past 2) people have said that theyâre incapable of discerning whether thereâs scum in the 4 of us. Why do you feel that Mantis is scum for this while others are not?
Overall I may have been a bit tunneled on you. I get that real-time interactions could be a towntell for you. And maybe my expectations of your play are too high. I could be wrong and you could be town but I wanna see your response to my questions above.
maybe my logic is forward ass and it is your logic that is the backward ass logic. ever think of that??
man now i really want to vote you
its like all of a sudden everyone cares about mafia in mafia451
Iâm a bit drunk and a bit sleepy so Iâm reading this tomorrow
Seriously
@Urist shes gone for the weekend so you want be getting any answers youâll have to look elsewhere⌠for the time being
No, thats just backward ass logic
You can, but youâll be wrong, and I will laugh once I flip!
yeah neymar could definitely catch a vote today
alright⌠let me just
UNVOTE: DS
Iâm going to flip out if town has just been going town v town this whole time
I can very easily see you, urist, skitter and DS as all town.
The one I am most concerned about is Urist.
More that he seemed to go into bat for you than anythign else.
I donât remember him doing that so much in other games I have played.
You have questioned his allignment a few times mantis.
What are you thinking of Urist now?
VOTE: NEYMAR
I know he has signed off for the night, but lets put some pressure on him.
Perhaps if next time he joins in he sees he is under threat of being lynched, he might condescend to play with us.
Can you explain why tho? What is your progression for this unvote?