This is also seems like you preparing for a potential mislynch.
@skitter30 what have we agreed that you will do? Jail both ActionDan and me?
You (and AD) need to be directing this action as the masons, not the other way around. AD has been doing that I think, but you need to do so as well. Assuming you two are telling the truth, and I have no real reason to think you arenāt, you need to be taking the lead, not riding in the backseat.
Iām openly discussing this with Dan is my point. I want us both to agree on something and Iāll put my vote down and rally for it. I want to be aligned with Dan though. If he doesnāt agree Iāll rethink.
-
thatās what mason chat is for
-
asking skitters what sheās doing isnāt openly discussing it with Dan, itās putting the decision in skitters hands. And skitters is probably town, but you guys should be the ones dictating actions here, cause thatās how mason play works.
I was asking Skitters about the Jailing piece, not her vote.
Also, Iām putting my thoughts out there because I want others to chime in too. Sure, I can just talk about it with Dan on the Mason chat. Thatās not the point though. Weāre only 2 of the many Town in this game.
I was talking about the jailing. Thatās what you dictate, not the votes, you donāt get to do that, weāre not that desperate yet.
Thatās such WIFOM
Nah thatās literally just how i figure out the game, Iāve mentioned this earlier and again itās obvious by how I do my own vote counts in games I host
Eh, thatās not at all what Iām saying, because good fake claims can totally throw that off, but yes, a town blitz often does set town up for an easy path if they do it right.
I can say resolve us and donāt lynch me at the same time because those arenāt conflicting statements and I know my own alignment (and now my proper role) and Iām everything Iāve said I am so Iād be a horrible lynch
So essentially the statements āresolve between usā means: lynch between the two of us so this conflict doesnāt go into a situation where it may lose town the game
And
The statement ādonāt lynch meā means: donāt fucking lynch me Iām the doctor
Btw just think about the logistics of the game. Do you think thereās no doctor?
Erika did flip as a āwatcherā even though it was a self watcher
Iām leaning Lynching Gtacc now. If only because 2-shot watcher alone feels awkward in what we already know of the setup and because the emphasis he places on the usefulness of that when he failed to detect scum when watching the scum kill is ugly.
I am increasingly paranoid of DSās role though because thereās turning out to be a ridiculously large amount of protective roles since Nanook hinted heās hiding one as well. I donāt think a single strongman is able to deal with all of them. Still keeping him alive to unsure Skitter lives is worth it. Obviously the death of either me/Andres/Skitter/Skitterās 2nd JK target tonight means DS gets lynched. no questions asked.
Iām pretty convinced that by play alone Skitter/Mylo are town, Screenplayās role is town.
You can make arguments for/against Cats/Urist.
After outing that we vig people as part of our roles Skitter should spend a shot of her JK to protect either Cats/Screenplay with the expectation that Mylo refunds one of their one shots. I think Screenplayās is a powerful ability if it targets one of me or AndrĆ©s in the future, since we wonāt be able to die if it does hit us. I actually think thatās the stronger play here. Though not by much.
Wait, how is that going to work?
How would four people be protected, am I missing something?
I can protect Skitter, and skitter should jail the masons to ensure all three of you live to tomorrow, then you vig the next night. If you are saying that you/Andres/skitter/skitters second target means that one of you arenāt being jailkept and so how could four people possibly be protected with three protections?
we have our own method of protecting ourselves, if at least one of us is protected.
Thatās why I was insisting only one of us be protected. and why I am nervous of your own role
Eh, just let Skitter JK you both and utilize that protection aspect of your role tomorrow night. I really think it will ease towns minds to not have to worry about possibly getting fucked over by a fake mason claim. If they jailkeep both of you tonight, this is really the only chance we have to prove that.
That should be unnecessary after we outed that we each have 1-shot vigs. They are a) confirmable and b) expected with the roles in this game (namely yours if youāre town). Iād rather we guarantee someone else living without any downsides.
While I can understand why that might not be optimal from your POV seeing the game as a mason, as a mason you need to realize the rest of town is uninformed and eliminating a possible world where you are scum is very important
1 Like
I disagree completely, even looking from the outside inwards objectively.