The players alignment will be publically announced the beginning of the next day.
It is only a one shot.
But i am still interested in the fact that skitters jk and my one shot both failed.
CORRECTION
It was not skitter who failed as such but RedFlavour.
Screenplay and Riley. Iâm not fully caught up so Iâm not 100% sure what they were doing. I think screen was on the cheeky wagon, and Riley wasâŚabsent, Iâm guessing? Gonna have to check that though.
I also kinda dislike skitters and gtaccâs pushes onto me today, they feel sort of opportunistic.
Heâs also a smart dude that I would not doubt has the ability to play against his meta like this.
That said, I tend to think youâre right.
The part of your logic where screen is good because he didnât NK N1, when it was literally impossible to NK, is pretty bad.
I sorta disagree with you and get some tingly feelings about PR hunting here. But I also tend to think youâre a weird fit with cheeky as scum.
As for Andre, his vote on Cheeky and then so quickly jumping off does look a bit scummy.
As if he put it on and then Oh Shit himself and jumped off quickly.
Still, I donât think Andre would plonk a vote on a scum buddy as a bus so late in the voting.
I mean, even if he thought it would only be the 5th vote, would he jump on and off like that as scum?
Seems like a clumsy way to try and distance himself.
Meh,
And? That just means Riley either didnât do the NK or skitters is lying. Most likely Rileyâs partner did the NK, if Riley is scum, cause I dunno why a skitters/Riley team takes that gambit of skitters lying.
ok, i can understand if youâre town here why youâre frustrated
but i donât know your scumgame that well and thereâs really no way for me to just know what you think scum!you would have been doing there without like talking to you about it
how would you have played it differently?
a) please explain how iâm being oppurtunistic rn
b) so the reason why iâm asking is because in response to ds saying we should look at the screen wagon (andres, me, you), your response was to protest that screen might not be scum. taken together, this feels to me a little like youâre trying to shift focus away from the screen wagon and onto screen himself, which feels a little off to me since you were on that wagon
like i guess itâs possible but i donât think itâs very likely
Maybe Iâm tunneled but I 100% donât believe gtaccs claim
Okay,
Please explain to me the benefit of making a claim that you watched the scum kill and got no result; as scum?
He really doesnât. If the partner is alive tomorrow they can claim at that time, the day before lylo.
I feel like Iâve gone into this already? But ok, Iâll hit the bullet points.
So, for Nanook to be scum on D1, that means he first doesnât jump on the Erika wagon when he easily couldâve to try and draw the lynch away from Neymar, then, after not doing that, also uses his ability to stop the lynch of NeymarâŚthereby removing any towncred heâd get from bussing Neymar.
Those things combined with the fact that off of tone and that I still kept playing and trying to solve the game last weekend when I very easily couldâve just said âsorry guys, wonât be hereââŚand I think that I should be read town. For one or two of them in isolation itâs wifom, sure, but taken as a collective, there just isnât a good reason to scumread me beyond âNanook is terrible at playing scum.â
Jumping onto a Nanook vote based off logic that amounts to âNanook is bad at scumâ is always going to feel somewhat opportunistic. Iâm not saying youâre necessarily scum for it, just that it feels slightly opportunistic.
IâŚthink Iâve been pretty steady in thinking screen is scum? And, like, if you look at it from a townNanook POV for a momentâŚand I have a scumread on screenâŚwhy should I be more suspicious of that wagon than of screen himself?
I think I agree.
What was his claim?
Sorry, you want me to explain how claiming watcher without having to provide any actual information would be useful for scum?
Umm⌠itâs kinda very obvious
Anyone can claim that tomorrow, Dan needs to confirm it to be legitimate.