As for Andre, his vote on Cheeky and then so quickly jumping off does look a bit scummy.
As if he put it on and then Oh Shit himself and jumped off quickly.
Still, I don’t think Andre would plonk a vote on a scum buddy as a bus so late in the voting.
I mean, even if he thought it would only be the 5th vote, would he jump on and off like that as scum?
Seems like a clumsy way to try and distance himself.
Meh,
And? That just means Riley either didn’t do the NK or skitters is lying. Most likely Riley’s partner did the NK, if Riley is scum, cause I dunno why a skitters/Riley team takes that gambit of skitters lying.
ok, i can understand if you’re town here why you’re frustrated
but i don’t know your scumgame that well and there’s really no way for me to just know what you think scum!you would have been doing there without like talking to you about it
how would you have played it differently?
a) please explain how i’m being oppurtunistic rn
b) so the reason why i’m asking is because in response to ds saying we should look at the screen wagon (andres, me, you), your response was to protest that screen might not be scum. taken together, this feels to me a little like you’re trying to shift focus away from the screen wagon and onto screen himself, which feels a little off to me since you were on that wagon
like i guess it’s possible but i don’t think it’s very likely
Maybe I’m tunneled but I 100% don’t believe gtaccs claim
Okay,
Please explain to me the benefit of making a claim that you watched the scum kill and got no result; as scum?
He really doesn’t. If the partner is alive tomorrow they can claim at that time, the day before lylo.
I feel like I’ve gone into this already? But ok, I’ll hit the bullet points.
So, for Nanook to be scum on D1, that means he first doesn’t jump on the Erika wagon when he easily could’ve to try and draw the lynch away from Neymar, then, after not doing that, also uses his ability to stop the lynch of Neymar…thereby removing any towncred he’d get from bussing Neymar.
Those things combined with the fact that off of tone and that I still kept playing and trying to solve the game last weekend when I very easily could’ve just said “sorry guys, won’t be here”…and I think that I should be read town. For one or two of them in isolation it’s wifom, sure, but taken as a collective, there just isn’t a good reason to scumread me beyond “Nanook is terrible at playing scum.”
Jumping onto a Nanook vote based off logic that amounts to “Nanook is bad at scum” is always going to feel somewhat opportunistic. I’m not saying you’re necessarily scum for it, just that it feels slightly opportunistic.
I…think I’ve been pretty steady in thinking screen is scum? And, like, if you look at it from a townNanook POV for a moment…and I have a scumread on screen…why should I be more suspicious of that wagon than of screen himself?
I think I agree.
What was his claim?
Sorry, you want me to explain how claiming watcher without having to provide any actual information would be useful for scum?
Umm… it’s kinda very obvious
Anyone can claim that tomorrow, Dan needs to confirm it to be legitimate.
He claimed watcher on Erika that didn’t see anything
Uh…what
VOTE: Gtacc
Scummy claim is scummy
With how inactive Riley is, it wouldn’t be a hard claim to pull off for a scum!Skitter
I’m not pushing a scum!skitter world at the moment just mentioning thoughts I’m having
Yeah to me that claim makes no sense. If you have no information as watcher you hold that claim.