@Mantis has been prodded
Friendly reminder that smilodon replaced AKFD and is somewhat likely to be scum.
I didnât see AKFD as Scum so I donât really know how to feel about the slot. Iâm finding it a bit frustrating that weâre really not close to figuring out what to do and itâs been so bloody long.
Players also keep getting prodded. @parsec who has been tunneling me literally the whole game, and now Mantis? Let me run through the list of players again and see where I stand.
Town Reads, Would Not Lynch:
{_fferyllt, Urist, Srceenplay}
Would be against lynching, but not a strong Town read:
{Catspurr, Parsec, Mantis}
Neutral, not a strong view either way:
{Judge Mental, smilodon, cabd}
Negative Lean, would vote for:
{Nanook, Metal Sonic, Josh}
The only one who might be a bit of a surprise is Nanook. The way heâs been targeting Catspurr throughout the game has been, in my mind, rather suspicious. I also recall in various instances feeling like the arguments he was creating were forced to make players appear Scummy. Look no further than my unvoting of ActionDan for an example of this. Or the argument with Srceenplay. Primarily though, I canât follow the logic on the Catspurr meta read, and thatâs bothering me.
However, Nanook plays this way as Town. So I canât say I have much certainty about my read. If it came to it, I think I would vote for him though.
Just curious, why did you wait so long to claim this?
Can you explain what this claim means?
It means she got a bauble on night zero. 
I agree as well.
The only doubt in the back of my mindâŠ
Started socializing and brain farted. Something about constantly doing it.
Like would scum keep drawing the attention.
Or
Town continuing to look for the ah ha moment.
VC 1-34
Nanook: 2 (Cabd, catspurr)
Josh: 2 (Urist, Metal Sonic)
Judge Mental: 1 (Srceenplay)
catspurr: 1(Nanook)
Andresvmb: 1 (parsec)
_fferyllt: 1 (Josh)
Metal Sonic: 1 (Andresvmb)
**Not voting: 4 (smilodon, _fferyllt, Mantis, Judge Mental)
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.
Deadline: August 13, 2018 4:00 AM
This topic will close automatically 30 minutes after the deadline.
Mod Notes:
VOTE: Josh
1 Like
SoâŠbasically you just donât like the way I play, it seems. Cool, cool.
You know thatâs a crappy way to try and read someone though, right?
This is not an honest attempt at engaging with my post. Iâm leaning negative on you because of the way you have engaged with Cats based on a meta read I canât follow. The meta read is also awfully vague and requires some sort of higher level thinking Iâm clearly not capable of. The style of your posting (meaning, your combativeness and abrasiveness) cut through the nonsense and Iâm totally fine with. But I donât agree with the main target.
Itâs an honest attempt to engage with the honest part of your post.
SoâŠis your scumread based on my scumread of cats, because you donât understand it?
it is of no consequence except that there was some N0 action and I thought I should say
What do you make of catsâs negative meta read of nanook?
I think I tried explaining it but sure. Itâs not based on your Scum read of Cats (since you are not alone in having done this today). Itâs based on the fact that almost the entire day youâve been bashing Cats based on a meta read that seems difficult to grasp. This has also drastically limited your focus. Thatâs mostly it.
This is an interesting question. I donât think Cats is entirely basing his vote on his negative read. I think the read is a style clash that Cats has described as something he needs to overcome (and look beyond). However, the overarching read is a problem, I would think, because itâll cloud your judgment more often than not.
If I had to highlight a difference, it would be that Cats is acknowledging it as a limitation, Nanook is using it as ammunition.
SoâŠin other words, my case/scumread on cats. Gotcha. I just loooooooove being scumread because you canât grasp my meta read, thatâs suuuuper fun and almost certainly going to be accurate. 