I totally understand where you are coming from. In general, I think I’m careful either way, and so I expect Scum to reveal themselves in subtle, hard to find ways (instead of obvious slips, though I do not discount them either). I scrub posts for clues and re-read constantly because I expect the game to be hard to solve. And so if I’m laser focused on something that might seem small, this is why.
Don’t take me for naive though. At least I don’t think I am.
I agree with this. Thus, my view of InActionDan is neutral now. However, I still think that his view of Cats for example is clear enough that I don’t find myself leaning Scum on him.
Because it seems to be literally the only way to engage you and force you to say something that doesn’t look like a 6-month-old hijacked your keyboard.
I don’t know how you find this playstyle to be effective or enjoyable. It’s annoying the hell out of me that you are deliberately refusing to participate in the game despite my attempts to engage you. If you don’t start putting at least a little bit of effort into the game, yeah I’ll be voting you today.
If I am being totally honest, I would probably be fine with voting for Josh if, over the course of today, he does not step it up. However, we still have 9 real days to go, so we should try and figure out what is going on with some of the other players that have yet to contribute meaningfully.
Well … to lynch him before end game where the whole Miller thing moght be brought into question. I mean I guess if he seems very town, maybe it’s not necessary. I’m not really sure which is why I was looking for some input on that
I agree that it really depends on the play. If it isn’t obvious, I wouldn’t take the chance. I don’t really want to commit either way though - it’s probably too early for it.