The reason I ask is because even though I was rather annoyed at _fferyllt for being lazy, I saw that behavior as being Town indicative (as I think others did). I just think I saw a lot more effort from _fferyllt when it was important for people to perceive him as Town, as when he was the SK in Flip Flappers (he was constantly complaining about a lack of effort from the Town in D1 for example).
I think your progression on _fferyllt is not crazy. It’s just that it was way off. As was your perception of Nanook. So you could just be wrong, and need to recalibrate. Or you could be Scum trying to push a narrative. You see what I’m saying?
If you are Scum, then you knew _fferyllt was Town. So you constantly ending on _fferyllt and away from Nanook is a bad sign. At the same time, if you were Scum, I think you might have been more careful than to let everyone know for sure that you were actually voting for Town. That’s what I’m saying. If you are Town, then you obviously would not have known. So Scum might be trying to make you look bad. But I am a little skeptical of going for the easy vote, so I am not sure how to read all of this.
I take Andre seriously, it that is what you mean.
Just because he is wrong about me does not mean the observation about nanook picking fights with scum buddies is wrong.
He aksed me rather pointedly why I didn’t hammer cabd.
I said I was early town reading skitter and was thinking no lynch was a better option and then when the smilo wagon got rolling I kinda got over excited and jumped on.
In my defense I had a slight town read on cabd.
Was very neutral on smilo, and have very leary about Smilos scum game.
It is amazing how often she rands scum.
He was unconvinced about nanooks voting me and his reason for doing so, but then pricked up his ears when nanook unvoted me in “frustration”.
Which I guess is a mark aganst me.
He also asked what was going on with my vote on Mental.
I said that I did not think it would start a wagon on mental.
That I even highlighted that is was an OMGUS vote because mental always scum reads me.
It was just a bad tempered display.
I also explained that I am far more emotional and bad tempered with these longer games.
And explained some points about this to Mantis.
She can relate that conversation if she wants to.
I don’t think nanook tried to make me look bad. If they did anything re me, they didn’t engage me too much. I think scum!screenshot is trying to make me look bad, look at their post above!!!1!!
At the time of the vote I don’t think I was, now I have a slight scum lean on you.
Or at best neutral.
What was the Bauble you recieved that fitted so well?
no, no idea what that all is about. I’ll get interested in all that blabber when it means something for my scum hunting, which at the moment it does not
I know that. I don’t know what you think I might find of particular importance that you come out alive from a temple or some such that contained scum who killed a vig who killed a scum. happy for ideas, though, buddy
I think maybe cats is thinking it’s an access thing?
Like at boardgamegeeks they regularly have huge games with various areas or ‘rooms’ where night actions are limited to who is in one’s room.
