no
you said you did it but you have given no underlying reasoning
no
you said you did it but you have given no underlying reasoning
There was more than just that. But those are I guess the prevalent ones. The ones I was looking at were (172 going to 180, 181, 190, 193, 410, 419, 426).
Also something which can be of note is the lack of action when your suspicious of someone (that is not just exclusive to squirrel)
the underlying reasoning was that the items you pointed out would fall similar to my views hence making them somewhat not scummy
I asked for your views a minute ago and you said none of those things lmao
well sorry to have views that are changing
that fast???
well they were in the process
what JK bear said applies to nick tbh about the content
his solvy posts have been hmm tbh imo because there was a speculation about scumteam size? and then asking people if they were town tbh
do you mean what quin said?
dude maybe hold on
alright @JKBear331 now can we talk about gellnick
do you still think he’s scummy or has that changed too
VOTE: JKBear331
oh I didn’t even think of what I assume you’re thinking of
what all i wanted to know was what fight ment
i still see nick a bit scummy but pretty close to neutral
yes
do you care to elaborate on your thoughts at all
i want to know what the /fight means so I know what it means as it could be multiple things. for nick i can see how others are taking him scummy. i also am tagging him scummy but not extremely so
is this a bad read?
probably yes