that’s correct
how do you know this?
not a scum, friend
I saw that you clarified on this. I’m super tired so will reread it tomorrow and then post thoughts.
Ok I understand a bit better where some of this is coming from due to your belief mantis was involved in Urist’s death. I didn’t make that assumption since that wouldn’t make any sense if the role gets janitored in the case Mantis is town. I tied her to the voteless Andres and that’s it.
to explain 2) it’s very simple. If scum have role A and role B and you know someone doesn’t have role A, the chance they are scum diminishes to roughly (a little more than) half what everyone else has. It doesn’t clear them of being role B, but I’ll always lynch someone with a chance of being role A OR role B unless there’s a preponderance of evidence against them, which I don’t see here.
As for screenplay, why were those votes on him good? I’ve seen his posts up to now be townie, can you explain why you scumread him?
@Mantis just to make sure, your action didn’t kill Urist nor hid his abilities on death, only that you were forced to target Urist with your role to make a person of your choice voteless the next day if Urist died?
MetalSonic (2): checkersman7, StarV
Srceenplay (2): MetalSonic, DS
Andresvmb (2): Srceenplay, Mantis
Not Voting (1): ActionDan
1 Like
let it rand
In Gtacc we trust?
VOTE: MetalSonic
Woah hey I thought we were letting it rand
VOTE: Andresvmb
1 Like
when’s deadline
11am ET
Is this scum avoiding responsibility of the lynch?
I’m almost certain checkersman7 is a priest, a.k.a, he can’t hammer. otherwise just ignore him.
Yo Chesskid fix the fucking votals please
VOTE: MetalSonic
yes daddy
While I love Gtacc, dont let him be the decision maker please