Chesskid IPick 2 - Medium Effort Version - Day 4

Completed Games Completed Onsite
, ,
#121

if the game allows everybody to win then why not do it

#122

What you’re arguing for is so easily manipulated as to be completely silly and unrealistic.

1 Like
#123

@Mafia we will funnel money for you to peacefully win if you no-kill tonight

#124

VOTE: M2H

#125

That may be an option when we get down to one wolf “we’ll give you $1000, you exit with a win and town wins cause there’s no mafia left”

But rn it’s not worth it just to get rid of one mafia :woman_shrugging:

#126

I don’t know why you are fighting this @Andresvmb

#127

the idea is that the game is breakable due to chess lessons that will presumably be an income source as the game continues

#128

No, it literally never works. You guys are not even thinking rationally here. So the Scum are going to out on the hope that they get cash for a win instead of being instantly Lynched? How would any rational Scum player even trust that?

#129

and if there’s one thing i love its breaking games mechanically

#130

I’m not counting on that being true

#131

If I’m at End Game, I’m literally never sending money to Scum so they can exit with a win. That’s playing against my win condition. And it’s also never happening.

#132

Why wouldn’t town follow through though? As long as it gets them a win too I see no reason not to :woman_shrugging:

#133

because we have no incentive to lynch them if they self-out :shrug:

if im being fair i think you’re up in arms over this idea more because you think its unsportsmanlike than that you think it is patently bad.

#134

Because they can win and the other faction actually lose, which they have worked presumably until the end to attain, instead of everybody riding into the sunset together like this is some kumbaya nonsense. No.

1 Like
#135

I mean I wouldn’t do it at f3 but if there’s one mafia alive with 3+ town alive too
I’d have to at least strongly consider it

1 Like
#136

Who cares who else wins as long as you do? Lol

1 Like
#137

No. It’s not even what I’m complaining about. Your logic is flawed - no rational person would behave like you suggest.

1 Like
#138

why not

#139

You’re guaranteeing that one side wins as Scum with the hope that the other faction (who otherwise wants to beat you) follows through. It’s not logical.

#140

And chances are that the rest of Town actually has to agree. You only need one dissenter most likely to guaranteed lose.