You cant read me correctly though and that has been a consistent issue with us. I understand that you think that you’ve finally gotten a good idea of how i play, but if this is you saying that you think im scum here then you are just completely wrong once more in that regard and you need to go back to the drawing board.
I would say that your reasoning behind me being scum off of inactivity d1 just invalidates your point here because you were saying that me and dusk being partners together and slanking WAS based on who we partnered with.
Im honestly not really trying to argue this over and over again though so like, the Dan lynch train has suddenly evaporated because StarV is gone. Are we still voting there?
I think StarV is playing this kinda sus rn, but I am cognizant enough to realize I have a bias there. Thoughts?
You guys pressure me to support reads that are mostly based on instincts so don’t get mad when the logic is flimsy. People misread me with “logical” reads all the time :shrug:
ngl I can’t really read Dan. I’ve mostly been tring him based on chess read. Kinda weak because low sample size etc.
DS you have yet to give an actual read, or an actual vote outside of d1. You ask lots of questions, and throw lots of shade, but have not actually done anything.
At the very least, I want you to explain why I should go against @chesskid3’s d1 poe by lynching anybody besides you or starv, or why I should vote starv when he has been extremely clear and vocal if nothing else.