Seems entirely plausible to me that scum would make sure their “RVS” vote was on the competing wagon.
It’s a second order read so not something I’ll push until we see gracc’s flip, and it’s scummy but not exactly a smoking gun, but it’s defjnitely something that pinged me.
The vote is peculiar. I think something more town intentioned describes a scenario where they scrolled down and decided the last wagon they saw as being the one their heart knew was right.
If they DID happen to read any of the thread it’s a complete coincidence. I think in either case it’s “needs more information”.
Gtacc: you were once willing to give a “last will” but now you’re remarking upon not self-hammering. Is there nothing more you really have to say? This gives the impression that you’re ghosting us here.
I thought this post was weird as well. Like Andres felt the need to defend voting in the bloc… when I said it wasn’t strange, but the basic idea of a group emerging had relevance when it came to gtacc’s unvote. From my experience Andres is a good wolf and I don’t think nerves would get the better of him, but it wasn’t a very helpful post.
Hammering is tempting, but post 314 is alarm-bells tier for me. How do people feel about this duck post after my frequent attempts to look into him? I didn’t exactly get new material to consider from the Duck, and I re-evaled once already and reached no new conclusion.
I wasn’t talking about the Duck’s reads. It’s that immediately after I made a whirlwind of posts his way, he remarks that he hopes that I will re-eval. Then proceeds to give me NOTHING relevant to what I was accusing him over, i.e. “what litmus test you [tn] failed in that moment”.
I don’t get the impression that Duckling wants me to re-eval my read on gtacc and that comment had everything to do with him himself. My take away is that he wants to keep his head down and get this lynch through.