Urist's Junk Mafia - Game Over

Completed Games Completed Onsite
,
#501

The earliest a kill from Jake’s ability can be used is night four.

#502

:thonk:

#503
#504
#505

Uh oh urist put us in a timeout

#506

Okay so its not 3+1=4 but 1+3=4?

#507

lmao

#508

Ok I can concede my math inferiority

#509

Does right for the wrong reason even count lmao

#510

I mean there’s 4 people that want to kill me or chess it’s pretty likely one of us dies no matter what our read on the other lol

#511

In math, no. In mafia, yes!

#512

Okay this is my solve.

GTacc tracked Seth to no one. So, Seth did not commit the NK. I claimed that I would Doc Doggo in the chat with GKB, and I was exactly blocked and Doggo NK’ed. Both of these point to GKB. I think both together are a bit incriminating. The one explanation for Doggo being NK’ed that excludes GKB is that Jake somehow passed this information on. But his flip does not contain any information that would even hint at him being able to communicate with Scum that are alive, and the way the game is set up makes it so that dead Town can only communicate with those with a particular passive in the dead chat (except for the bonus affecting Doggo), so why would dead Scum be able to actively communicate with Scum still alive? That seems far fetched.

Now, the big question is, is GKB Scum and bussing, or is he placing a vote that thinks wins the game for Scum? Seth wants to also vote Nanook, so it strikes me as rather unlikely that they are all “wrongly” cross-voting and it’s some sort of 4d chess we’re playing. So I would think it’s a winning vote for Scum. So I should be voting Nanook/GKB in whichever order.

Is Chess this wrong about Nanook though? I also have a problem with this.

So yeah, I don’t know. I am most skeptical of GKB out of everyone, so if I desperately had to choose, I would start there probably.

#513

@GTacc are you just going to wait for the game to happen or…?

#514

Wait why is gkb/seth not a possibility consistent with this logic from your pov

#515

thats my 4d chess andres/seth fear right there hahaha

#516

I would have to be completely against Elli’s view then.

#517

I’m not arguing this as Scum, faking Doctor, fooling Elli, and then arguing against his point of view. I mean it’s too difficult to pull all of that off. And then what, my Claim is completely made up?

#518

Thanks for holding my Scum game in such high regard, but c’mon now.

#519

Also, if anybody had targeted you Chess, you would know the third part of my claim is false. That’s a massive gamble.

#520

Wait, what’s the third part of your claim?