if somebody hammers right now without asking first then I am always going to suspect them because ending the day early normally hurts town.
Itâs not. Iâm highlighting what I think is rather contradictory in voting for someone and then showing concern that they get hammered. The answer is then to not vote and put pressure a different way. It just seems weird to me.
its not contradictory because if somebody comes and hammers him they are prob scum and should get copped tonight.
How can you make this claim without knowing what Dusk is going to flip?
@Josh can you help me out here?
so if somebody intentionally hammers him after being warned that they are at l-1 I will be perfectly happy because they are 90% caught scum.
Have you played with Tier before? If you have, then you are simply tempting fate here.
just the deep south maf.
UNVOTE
just so we have plenty of time
Not Voting (4): Andresvmb, Tier, ErikaFurudo, DS
neither wolf is voting VOTE: DS
wolfy non post
i literally just unvotedâŠ
also why do you think neither wolf is voting?
probability
4/9 players are not voting - meaning that 4 players are (removing yourself) and you think the probability is weighted toward both not voting?
Why are people voting me again?
Oh wait itâs not that many nvm
Youâre at L-2
I want to hammer just cause of this post.
Take this as a compliment - I actually donât think you have ever been afraid or cared to put a hammer vote down. And since I havenât seen you play Scum yet, itâs clearly not indicative of you being Scum. Which is why I so strongly disagree with the statement that a hammer there was a Scum claim. Nonsense.